March 2, 2011

Three-to-Five Referendum Question Explained Graphically

Why change the number of selectmen from three to five?

    I compiled the attached to illustrate why Rehoboth does not need to change from 3 Selectmen to 5. The basis of my comparison is Population (Number of people represented by 3 Selectmen) and our Operating Budget (what we spend to basically run the town).

    I compared the Towns that have 10,000 residents and over  that have 3 Selectmen and have the Open Meeting form of government.  If these other Towns with populations and budgets much larger than Rehoboth's can successfully operate with 3 Selectmen, I don't understand why we would change to 5 Selectmen. SEE INFORMATION BELOW.

Pamela Christman - Rehoboth Resident for almost forty years

March 6, 2011

A Mountain Out of a Mole Hill

    For weeks we have been hearing about the "incident".  The Rehoboth Police Chief was at a Christmas party at a restaurant in East Providence RI.  He left the building and the events that followed have become fodder worthy of tabloid publication.   There has been a consistent, boisterous, and very vocal call for an investigation by the State Police, the District Attorney, the Sheriff and others.  The newspapers, radio shows, television stations, investigative reporters, internet sites, and local coffee shops are buzzing with opinions and speculation.  As time goes on the responses are filtering in.  Here are excerpts from local new sources i.e. rehobothnow.com, radio, print and news reports.

    MA State Police Say No to Enos Investigation---The request was reviewed at the highest levels including internal affairs before declining to participate due to  lack of jurisdiction, lack of evidence of any criminal misconduct on Enos’ part and being too busy with actual crimes to use the limited resources of the MA State Police to conduct an investigation. 

  DA’s Office Also Says No to Enos Investigation---The office of Bristol County District Attorney Sam Sutter has also declined.  Lisa Rowell of Sutter’s office said the Enos case “does not involve criminal charges” and therefore cannot do an investigation because the Enos case is a personal matter and did not involve any criminal activity.

  Rhode Island U.S. Attorney’s office---A public information officer for the Rhode Island U.S. Attorney’s office is quoted in media reports they cannot get involved because it is a “local matter, not a federal matter” and that it’s level of importance is equal to that of being caught “jaywalking.”  

     I have known Chief Enos on a professional basis, for many years.  I have always viewed him as fair, honest and reputable.  The incident that has caused this uproar involving Chief Enos is regrettable.    We have responses declining requests for investigations from the MA State Police, the Bristol County Attorney General's office and RI U.S. Attorney's office.   Lt. Brady of the Rehoboth Police has recommended that the Board of Selectmen hire an experienced private investigator.  I anticipate that the Board of Selectmen will reflect upon Lt. Brady's recommendation with due diligence.  As a taxpayer, I must question if an investigation is necessary after numerous organizations have declined to move forward.   

     The organizations that declined to investigate the incident consistently stated that there was not any criminal misconduct or activity.  Chief Enos was off duty.  There was no damage or monetary loss to the Town.  East Providence Police were called, a report filed and an investigation followed.  There was no "cover-up".  Chief Enos notified the Rehoboth Selectmen immediately.  I believe this incident was a poor decision by Chief Enos.  Unfortunately each and every one of us has made poor decisions at one time or another.  The outcry in print and on the news stations has been loud and often based on insufficient, unreliable or exaggerated information.    Regrettably, in today's climate an individual's reputation, career, privacy and civil rights can be transgressed with little or no merit.  This type of disparagement remains unconscionable.  The old idiom "A Mountain Out of a Mole Hill" is certainly appropriate.

Jack Hutson - Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 4, 2011

EDITOR’S NOTE:  The two opinion letters below are not news reports.  Rather they both contain carefully selected statistical information from online sources that reinforce their particular arguments.  Neither letter contains all the municipal statistical data available for a fully complete unemotional analysis.  By omitting certain statistics, the data has indeed been manipulated by both writers, an altogether common practice during the course of an argument.  

Data Manipulated in Example of Towns and Three vs Five Selectmen

The five member board of selectmen issue explained geographically

   The recent letter in VOX Populi by Pamela Christman shows some interesting statistics about towns with a three-member board of selectmen. 

   According to Mark Twain, "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.”  However, I found it lacking in some important facts: towns that have a five member board of selectmen.

   Though most of the towns listed in Ms. Christman article have three selectmen have a town administrator, the duties of that position vary widely from town to town.  Even Ms. Christman’ source, www.mma.org states that the duties of each town’s administrator vary. Towns with strong boards of selectmen (like Rehoboth) often operate with weak town administrators. Towns like Marshfield have strong town administrators with weak boards of selectmen. These variations can have a profound affect on the daily operations of a town.  

   For example, Ms. Christman points out that a town like Marshfield, which has a much larger population than Rehoboth and a much larger operating budget, has only three selectmen.  

   The problem is that Marshfield is nothing like Rehoboth.  Marshfield’s town administrator has more duties and responsibilities than the Rehoboth town administrator.  Marshfield adopted a town charter in 2003 that increased the duties of the town administrator and added a facilities manager position.  Three selectmen could operate effectively if a town charter is adopted that helps lighten the load of these selectmen by expanding the duties of other town departments. Rehoboth has no such charter.

   Please see the chart below of small towns with similar populations as Rehoboth and some with similar and some smaller budgets.  All of these towns have a five member Board of Selectmen.  Rehoboth‘s population for 2009 was 11,515 with an operating budget in FY2010 of $20,481,399. (MMA.org) 

     The point is that each town has different reasons for how they operate.  Economics is only one of the driving forces.   Marshfield pays its town Administrator between $120,000 and $ 135,000 with a three year contract and now has an additional full time position of facilities manager.  Rehoboth pays its town administrator between $65,373.00 and

$73,128.84.

   If economics is the driving force for citizens of Rehoboth, then increasing the size of the board of selectmen makes sense as the town grows. It allows us to keep a strong board of selectmen and a weak town administrator. Since the current selectmen are overwhelmed as it is now and can’t keep track of important issues (i.e. where our Police Chief resides & the ability to follow Open Meeting Laws.)  Wouldn’t you rather plan ahead now and increase the number of the board of selectmen to help better manage town operations?

    Remember Mark Twain who also said, “Facts are stubborn, but statistics are more pliable.” Let’s consider the facts and not the statistics.  SEE INFORMATION BELOW.

Bev Baker - Rehoboth Resident

January 7, 2012

Sun Chronicle Editorial Unfair to Rehoboth

     I read with concern the January 6, 2012  editorial in the Attleboro Sun Chronicle, "Open Meeting Law Wins Round in Rehoboth."  Yes, the Board of Selectmen may have rushed to remove Christopher Morra without due process, but they were attempting to prevent more lawsuits that are costing the town's insurance millions of dollars. 

      I strongly disagree with the following statement in their editorial, "However, it wasn't Morra's comments that put the town in legal jeopardy this time. It was the actions of the board of selectmen in ignoring the provisions of the law in their haste to remove what they obviously see as a thorn in their side. And Morra has done a public service by pointing out the violation."
     Unfortunately, statements made by Mr. Morra at the last finance committee meeting has once again put the town in legal jeopardy. Because of these statements another lawsuit has been filed.  Mr. Morra has been involved in multiple lawsuits and because he is a sitting member of the Finance Committee the town pays his legal fees and cost over a million in settlements.  Then he states he wants to continue serving the town.  If it wasn't so sad it would be actually laughable. 

      Mr. Morra has asked once again to be indemnified in the latest lawsuit.  Why?  In my opinion, his comments were of a personal nature and did not concern town business. 

      The Board of Selectmen cannot use town counsel for advice or guidance regarding Mr. Morra, as town counsel is representing Mr. Morra in filed lawsuits.  How ironic is that?

      The Attleboro Sun Chronicle's editorials and columns have not been fair to Rehoboth.  They  seem to have bias in favoring Mr. Morra.  Why not do an editorial on ALL the lawsuits that have involved Mr. Morra, and the cost to the town and the town’s insurance?

      Rehoboth is moving forward despite having a thorn in its side.  How about reporting the positive changes that have been made in town since last April?

Lorraine Botts, Rehoboth Resident

(Ms. Botts was appointed to the Rehoboth Council on Aging in 2011 and currently serves as chairperson.)

-----------------------

December 31, 2011

Rejection of Dismissal

Note:  the following letter was written by Christopher Morra to Rehoboth Town Administrator Jeffrey Ritter on December 28, 2011.  It was submitted to Vox Populi by Mr. Morra.

     “In response to your letter of December 22, 2011, please be advised that I reject the improper action of the Board of Selectmen on Monday, December 19, 2011 “to rescind (my) appointment to the Finance Committee.”  As Mr. Costello and Mr. Tito should know, the Board of Selectmen is without authority to remove me from the Finance Committee under the circumstances.  Massachusetts law provides due process protections for my term of service once I am sworn in as a Finance Committee member -- I was given no notice of this planned and improper action of the Board of Selectmen.  Our local Bylaw only allows for removal if a member is excessively absent -- I have not been absent from a regular session of the Finance Committee.  While I understand that you are merely the messenger of the Board of Selectmen’s improper act, I must respond to you as the official that sent the notice of December 22, 2011.  You are informed that I will challenge the Board of Selectmen’s improper action at all appropriate levels of government.

     Mr. Costello’s personal call to have me removed from the Finance Committee is just one more example of his personal disregard for me and disregard for lawful governance of this town.  It is important to remember that Mr. Costello previously attempted to unseat me from the Finance Committee shortly after he became Chairman of the Board of Selectmen.

     Mr. Costello’s animus towards me is well known.  Indeed in his recent election activities, Mr. Costello together with Mr. Tito employed my name in a derogatory manner and made false and disparaging remarks about me although I was not on the ballot.  Mr. Costello has often distorted facts were I am concerned in order to advance his own agenda.  His remarks on December 19, 2011 fit his pattern of disparagement of me.  Mr. Costello’s disparaging and distorted remarks about me at the Board of Selectmen’s meeting on December 19 were shameful and hypocritical, particularly where he is the subject of a scathing report by the Massachusetts Inspector General’s office alleging he violated laws for his own personal gain.  I have served the Town of Rehoboth for the betterment of the town and its residents and not for my own personal “agenda” or gain.

     Please be advised that complaints for Open Meeting Law violations relating to the improper actions of the Finance Committee and the Board of Selectmen, which are at the center of this controversy, are being contemporaneously filed with the Town Clerk.

     In closing, I am still an active member of the Rehoboth Finance Committee and will continue to serve the Town of Rehoboth despite the continuing actions of some in government to misuse their authority to cause me and other’s harm.”

Christopher Morra

-----------------------

November 1, 2011

Sticks and Stones

     "Sticks and stones may break my bones but names can never hurt me."  Too bad someone is writing those vile letters upsetting some people in town government.

     How would you like to be a person falsely accused of writing those letters?

     Police show up at your home a little after noon with a search warrant. They take two computers from your home along with several other items. One computer, over quite a period of time, had spent at least two days a week unattended by its owner, at a business (owned by a relative) and frequented by members of the RPD.

     The police asked the accused to come to the station later in the day for questioning.  Meanwhile, later in the afternoon, the acting chief contacts a civilian and asks her to contact the press to be sure they attend the selectmen's meeting that evening for a breaking news story.  The accused has not even been questioned at this point.  (Does the RPD actually have a press agent?)

      Later in the day, after 6 p.m., the accused goes to the police station, as requested,  for questioning.  He doesn't know why he is being questioned about letters he said he had absolutely nothing to do with.  During the questioning the acting chief leaves and goes to the selectmen's meeting and makes

a public statement about the accused.  At this point the public knows what was going to happen before the accused was told anything.  The accused goes home not knowing anything other than he had been questioned.

      The next day the accused is contacted and told what was said at the selectmen's meeting.  He tells everyone who contacts him that he was not charged or arrested.  When the police department is contacted and asked for proof, there is none that can provided.  Later, the person that requested the proof was called with a court date and once again this information had not yet been given to the accused.

     In my opinion, being called names and the use of obscenities in a private letter doesn't come close to the trampling of a person's civil rights and damage to his reputation before the facts are known and the legal process is completed.

Pamela Christman, Friend of the Accused and Resident of Rural Rehoboth

-----------------------

October 30, 2011

Response to “Welcome to the New Rehoboth, Harvey”

    In your October 22, 2011edition Mr. Daniel F. Harrington’s letter, “Welcome to the new Rehoboth, Harvey” attempted to trivialize Mr. Harvey Bigelow’s alleged writing, “a letter that contained ’false accusations’ and ’profanity.’ ”  He asked if it warranted a four-month investigation.

     As a recipient of two mailed envelopes with a total of three letters enclosed, I strongly disagree with Mr. Harrington.  It was not one letter.  There were multiple letters sent to multiple residents of Rehoboth including two selectmen and their wives.  The letter to me personally was vulgar and threatening.  And yes, it did warrant a four-month investigation if that is what it takes to apprehend the person responsible.   

     Mr. Harrington raised the subject again of the attack on Mr. Christopher Morra.   Mr. Harrington asks, “Why hasn’t law enforcement prosecuted?” He should ask the East Providence police as they were the investigating body, and there was a prosecution through the judicial system.

     Mr. Donald Bennett who was arrested for the attack, did his time and stated in his deposition in order to have his real estate license reinstated that he had driven a friend to Mr. Morra’s place of business to collect money owed by Mr. Morra. (State of RI, Dept. of Business Regulation, DBR#. 08-L-0092, Decision Upon Motion for Reconsideration, page 3 & 4).  In my opinion, it was not connected to Rehoboth politics, and this subject has gotten old and should be put to bed.

     It is too bad that citizens of Rehoboth cannot campaign and vote for whomever they wish without fear of retaliation.  If your candidate does not win in April, there is always next year.  Let’s stop the hate and intimidation.  And Mr. Harrington, we do have a new Rehoboth. Rehoboth IS moving forward for the better.  We have selectmen, finance committee members, zoning board members, etc. who are working hard to do what is best for the town, not for themselves or for an individual.  We should ALL be working together for the betterment of Rehoboth.

Lorraine Botts, Rehoboth Resident

(Ms. Botts was appointed to the Rehoboth Council on Aging in 2011 and currently serves as chairperson.)

-----------------------

October 22, 2011

Welcome to the New Rehoboth, Harvey.

     You can’t say I didn’t warn you. Recently, Harvey Bigelow, a private citizen, was detained and interrogated, tried in the media and pronounced guilty. His house was searched and his computer confiscated; the accusations against him proudly broadcast at a Board of Selectman meeting. His crime? He was considering running for Selectman.

     Over a year ago (09/30/2010), in a letter published in the Taunton Gazette, I wrote the following regarding the stunning harassment (attempted murder, illegal background checks, a gutted goat on his lawn, etc.) of former selectman Christopher Morra:

     “If they can do these things to Mr. Morra they can certainly do them to you. So think twice before you speak publicly at a town meeting. Or, perhaps, find out whose ring you must kiss before deciding to run for office. Your life and that of your livestock may depend on it.”

     Spot on, huh?

     Amazingly, the official charge against Mr. Bigelow was writing a letter that contained “false accusations” and “profanity” (a misdemeanor offense rarely prosecuted). Ask yourself: Does that sound like something that warrants a four-month police investigation and home invasion?   More important, what are the odds the respectable Mr. Bigelow will be cleared of all charges? Pretty good, I’d say. But no matter – the damage is done, the message delivered.

     Chairmen of the Board of Selectman, Mike Costello, declared of the innocent-before-proven-guilty Bigelow’s abduction, “I’m extremely thankful. Patience does prevail.”

     Or does it? It’s been years since selectman Christopher Morra was brutally attacked and beaten across state lines. One man served a short prison sentence but his accomplice and the men who hired them remain unnamed. Why hasn’t law enforcement prosecuted the men responsible for ordering a “hit” on an elected official? Wouldn’t Rehoboth be a safer place if we prosecuted those who would commit murder before we prosecuted those who pen naughty letters?

     And what about the senior citizens of Horton Estates who are “patiently” waiting for the Commonwealth to weigh in on Chairman Costello’s real estate dealings as outlined by the infamous report by the Inspector General?

     Justice delayed is justice denied. It’s past time the Attorney General of Massachusetts and/or the Federal Bureau of Investigation concluded their various investigations and prosecuted those responsible for the real crimes in Rehoboth, conspiracy to commit murder, corruption and fraud among them. But make no mistake: we are at a tipping point and independent law enforcement must act if they really wish to stem further intimidation and violence.

    In the meantime, welcome to the new Rehoboth, Harvey: The town where patience prevails. The 21st century town that feels a lot like 17th century Salem. The town where dead goats appear one day and personal computers disappear the next.

Daniel Harrington, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

September 15, 2011

Stayed tuned for information on National Grid Credit.

     The selectmen were informed about a statement on a local radio show about a $150 credit from the National Grid for power lost for more than three days.  We have confirmed that report was made on WPRO 63 AM.  What they did not report was the offer was for Rhode Island customers only. 

     I have called National Grid and spoke to a ranking official and explained the confusion.  He told me he would look into it, and if Rhode Island is doing it then Massachusetts should also.  He will be getting back to me as soon as he can set up a meeting with top executives to discuss the credit offer.

     As soon as the town is notified, we will be putting out a press release.  I am sorry for any confusion this has caused anyone. 

Michael Costello, Chairman Board of Selectmen

-----------------------

September 13, 2011

Will residents be provided a credit or not?

     Based on a news story published, ‘Dr. Toto announced that residents who were without power for at least three days would be entitled to a $150 credit’. Now there is a news story asking residents to stop calling town hall and National Grid about the credit. Will residents be provided a credit or not?  

Michael F. Powis, Rehoboth Citizen & National Grid customer

-----------------------

September 9, 2011

Settled lawsuit against Christopher Morra

    John Krasnianski and Bree Krasnianski have settled one of their lawsuits against Christopher Morra. The case that settled was started in the Bristol County Superior Court and was based on defamatory statements published by Mr. Morra to third parties. Mr. Morra a former Selectmen in the Town Rehoboth Massachusetts filed a complaint with the division of professional licensure alleging that a local engineer had not properly performed his duties. However, attached to the complaint was a multipage gratuitous attack on various members of the Rehoboth community that Mr. Morra does not like, including Mr. Krasnianski and his daughter. This multipage attack was labeled as "cast of characters". This cast of characters narrative had nothing to do with the complaint filed with the division of professional licensure. Mr. Morra denied that he attached or included this narrative with his filing. However, the complaint form published by the division of licensure and signed by Mr. Mora clearly stated “narrative attached". Some of the other parties named in the cast of characters narrative have also filed suit against Mr. Morra in superior court. For now, that case is still pending.

     Mr. Krasnianski is a former Selectmen in the town of Rehoboth and his daughter Bree is a police officer in that town. Mr. Krasianski stated that he was very upset that Mr. Morra resorted to these tactics. The cast of characters narrative accused Mr. Krasnianski of committing wrongful acts. Mr. Morra also accused Mr. Krasnianski's daughter Bree of engaging in unethical and improper activity. There appeared to be no reason why Mr. Morra would have, or should have, filed the narrative with the division of professional licensure. Bree Krasnianski stated that it is difficult performing her duties as a police officer when the general public believes you are involved in or could be involved in such activities. She said it is difficult enough for her being a female police officer and it is extremely hard to expect the general public to respect you when they wrongfully believe that you have been involved in improper activity.

     This case is the second case that has settled against Mr. Morra in the past few months. Mr. Morra denied all of the Krasnianski's allegations but after extensive discovery and multiple days of depositions the insurance company chose to settle the case and pay the Krasnianski's. Both of the Krasnianskis felt bad that the town and its insurance company had to incur these tremendous costs in an effort to try and defend Mr. Morra. In an effort to leave the town out of this litigation the Krasnianskis only filed suit against Mr. Morra in his individual capacity not as a Selectmen in the town of Rehoboth. However, Mr. Morra was able to convince the town or its insurance company to provide him with coverage, despite the fact that Mr. Morra had coverage through one of his own policies. The town's insurance policy is the one who ended up paying the Krasnianskis.

     John and Bree have another lawsuit pending against Mr. Morra as well as Edward Schagrin and Barbara Cavanaugh for posting other defamatory statements about them on the Internet website entitled Rehoboth Unmoderated. The Krasnianskis felt that it was best for them and for the town to bring this matter to a conclusion without the long drawn out process of going to trial and further damaging the town's reputation and costing the town more money. Mr. Krasnianski stated that he was glad that the insurance company could see the merit of his claims, and he wanted to spend time focusing on the Internet case pending against Mr. Morra. The publications made by him on that website against my daughter and I are so outrageous and egregious that we need to focus our time and effort on prosecuting that case. Hopefully, the insurance companies involved in that claim will also see how wrong Mr. Morra's acts are, and maybe we will be able to resolve that case without a lengthy trial. Discovery has not begun in that case. Once the discovery stage begins we hope it become apparent how wrong Mr. Morra has treated us. The town has been damaged enough by the acts of Mr. Morra it's time to start bringing all of these lawsuits against him to some resolution so that the town can begin to rebuild itself into the community that it once was.

John Krasnianski, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

August 20, 2011

Letter to the Chairperson of the Zoning Board of Appeals.

Dear Mr. Breault,

    Recently I received a copy of a letter signed by you and Frank Moitozo.  It was addressed to the Rehoboth Board of Selectmen and Kathleen Conti, Rehoboth Town Clerk.  You also sent a copy via certified mail to Gregory Sullivan, Massachusetts Inspector General.  To the best of my knowledge no members of the current ZBA (excluding Mr. Moitozo and yourself of course) were given a copy. 

     In this letter you refer to ZBA file # 729 which was filed with the Rehoboth Town Clerk on February 28th, 2005.  This is the same file that you had placed for discussion on the June 16th, 2011 ZBA agenda.  After considerable discussion amongst the board members present that evening I made a motion to table the action of writing a letter for the purpose of defeat.  The motion was seconded by Mr. O'Hern.  At that time some of the concerns that were expressed was that it wasn't within our pervue to address the situation nor was it a good idea to approve the sending of a letter which, by your own admission, hadn't been written yet.  The vote was 3-2 to table.  Imagine my surprise when I saw your letter.  It was written on the ZBA letterhead and signed by you as chairman.  Furthermore, although you made reference to the vote taken on June 16th, 2011, you went on to say: "The ZBA further demands that the town of Rehoboth refer this matter to the Massachusetts Attorney General and the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts for a determination as to whether criminal laws of the Commonwealth and/or the United States were, or continue to be, violated........."

     As the minutes of the June 16th, 2011 meeting attest to, the current ZBA voted to table the idea NOT "demand that the Town of Rehoboth refer this matter......".  Where in your mind, or that of Mr. Moitozo, you thought you had the RIGHT to send this letter is beyond comprehension.  What can a board do when they take a vote and then find out that the chairperson blatantly disregarded the wishes of the majority of the body and proceeded on his own?  I believe that the only remedy is for you to step down as chairperson and write another letter on your own stationary apologizing for implying in your June 17th, 2011 letter that the current Rehoboth ZBA approved of your actions.

John L. Scanlon, Jr., Clerk, Rehoboth Zoning Board of Appeals

-----------------------

Editor’s Note  August 19, 2011

In the case of a “debate” evolving between two readers, the rule of “statement/statement/rebuttal” will be followed for any specific topic, as in the case of the three letters printed below from Ms. Christman and Ms. Botts.

August 19, 2011

You can’t have it both ways.

        I gave no support to the anonymous writer.  I pointed out that Mr. Tito was critical of a person who sent letters anonymously, then proceeded to put anonymous letters in a formal report.  You can't have it both ways.  

        P.S.  I am incapable of doing anonymous.

Pamela Christman, Rural Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

August 18, 2011

Reader finds letter upsetting.

       I find it upsetting that Pamela Christman would support an anonymous letter writer who slanders not only one of our selectmen; but also some of our Rehoboth residents (Guess Who? Anonymous August 17, 2011).  The anonymous police officers who gave testimony in an investigation are known by the police unions and the selectmen.  The anonymous letter writer is known only by a select few of his cohorts.

      If one reads the report, the police were civil and gave constructive criticism.  The anonymous writer who Ms. Christman supports stated to me in my two letters, “Lorri – you are a miserable, sorry, demented, “f *ing,” lonely old lady.  How “f*ing” stupid can you be?” 

     What does this tell you about Ms. Christman?  Maybe she should have sent her letter to Rehoboth Now anonymously.

Lorraine Botts, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

August 17, 2011

Guess Who?  Anonymous.

        At the last Selectmen's Meeting a letter was read, it was from an anonymous writer.  Selectman Tito took offense and showed great disdain toward the person who wrote the letter, because that person made critical statements and didn't reveal their identity.

      However, Selectman Tito apparently thinks it is O.K. for him to publish a report containing complaints  from anonymous police officers. The investigation he is conducting is on behalf of the Town and he felt it wasn't necessary for us to know who was making these complaints?  He represents us, the Town, not the Police.

    Guess Who?   Anonymous.

Pamela Christman, Rural Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

August 10, 2011

Now what are we left with?

     Enough already!  Two local rags have been printing “stories” about the Police Dept. vs. The Chief.  These organizations are printing information taken from Union Complaints and letters from officers.  Hmmmm?  Pay dues and rally the gang together and your wishes come true.  Note, these rages were very particular as to which of the Chief’s replies they printed.

     Morale, not one Rehoboth Police Officer attended Chief Enos’ swearing-in ceremony.  He hadn’t even started and they were already engaging the “Brotherhood” tactics to show they didn’t want him.  Why?  Was it because Chief Miranda was let go?  Was it because their new Police Station wasn’t going to be built?  The Chief didn’t have anything to do with those issues.  He didn’t have a chance from day one.

     Investigation? The person doing the investigating was as politically biased as the officers.  Too bad, as a physician, (and open to malpractice charges) you’d think he would have an understanding of what the one-sided procedure he utilized would mean to someone’s career.  Chief  didn’t even have access to his files which would have provided more detail for his responses. He also cannot comment on on-going investigations.  They jumped him with his hands tied behind his back. 

     The Chief has many avenues of recourse, so I’m sure he will have a good future.  What are we left with?

Pamela Christman, Rural Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

June 16, 2011

Acting in the Best Interest of the Town    

    The most troubling thing I find when Selectman Leffort files a motion for an investigation recommended by the Inspector General (with prejudice) into Mr. Costello’s actions, Dr. Tito refused to agree to the investigation. 

     Dr. Tito puts politics, relationship or both ahead of the best interest of the town.  Mr. Tito really doesn’t have a choid in this matter.  He has to agree to an investigation or accept a very tenuous term (expires April 2012).

     As our selectman, Mr. Tito needs to put the town first.

John Kiepler, Rehoboth Resident for 29 Years

-----------------------

June 4, 2011

A Response to Previous Letter    

   I found Michael Powis’ letter  interesting in that he did not know all the facts regarding the Inspector General’s Report, the $2000 reward being offered by Mike Costello and the Rehoboth Policies involvement in the investigation.

1. 1) The SIG report is an allegation that Selectman Costello is in the process of answering.
   

2. 2) The flyer was not true and the postal service was used to perpetuate defaming  falsehoods during an election. 
   

3) The flyer illegally used the “pants on fire logo”

4) Detective Ramos has been investigating the flyer since it was mailed.

5. 5)The postal service is again being used to perpetuate the harassment of certain citizens in town with unsigned letters.
   

    (Powis said) “The last part of Mr. Costello’s press release is very troubling;  “Those having any information should contact Detective Ramos at the Rehoboth Police Department by calling 508-252-3723.  “All leads will be confidential.”  Since when is a Selectman allowed to use the Rehoboth Police Department as his own private detective service? The Inspector General’s report detailed specific incidents of criminal activity by Mr. Costello, why isn’t the Rehoboth Police department conducting an investigation of Mr. Costello? 

    Nothing troubling about it.  The SIG Report is not under the Rehoboth Police’s jurisdiction.  The police are involved because an elected official and his wife as well as other citizens of the town are being threatened and intimidated.

    (Powis said)  “It is abundantly clear that Mr. Costello lacks the personal ethics and integrity to represent the citizens of Rehoboth. If Mr. Costello refuses to resign, all Rehoboth citizens should sign a recall petition.”

     Cannot agree with you here either.  He is doing a great job along with Selectman Tito and Selectman Leffort in moving this town forward.

      (Powis said) Where are all the individuals who identified themselves as ‘Concerned Rehoboth Citizens’?

     A meeting was held and it was made clear that allegations against Selectman Costello, and Selectman Leffort are personal.  Rehoboth Concerned Citizens are interested in the government of the town moving forward in a positive manner.  Making sure that all bylaws are followed.  Making sure that town vendors live up to their contracts.

     Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?

Lorraine Botts, Citizen and Taxpayer of Rehoboth

-----------------------

June 1, 2011

What Seems Like a Subtle Change May Misdirect Researchers    

    At last night’s Board of Selectmen’s meeting, I made a comment about the discrepancy in the cemetery name of Rehoboth’s Historical Cemetery 22. I would like you to understand why.

    Over the last 11+ years I have run 3 international genealogy forums. The last one to form is OldRehoboth.com and the original reason it was formed was to help people in my other forums find their buried ancestors in our town. Some of you may not know that Rehoboth was not originally established where it is today. It was established twice in what is now Rhode Island. Most of our early records are in the Rhode Island Historical Society’s archives.

    When someone sees a record that their early ancestor was buried in Rehoboth, MA, it is possible that they should be looking for that grave in East Providence, Pawtucket, Woonsocket, Cumberland, Barrington, Seekonk, Swansea, Attleboro, or North Attleboro instead of Rehoboth.  The cemeteries also cause some confusion with redundant naming or moving of graves in the name of progress (e.g.,Old Kirkyard to Woodlawn).

     USGenWeb.com, Bristol Cemeteries Database, The Trim Library, OldRehoboth.com, FindAGrave.net, Ancestry.com, Genealogy.com, and Rootsweb.com, among others, are all used to archive genealogical records. All, except the library,  run forums to gather info and discuss different issues. None refer to this cemetery as Comfort Pearce. Some refer to it as the Ingalls Family Lot because this is what people transcribing the stones have called it.

    Even a map the Cemeteries Commission hands out to visiting researchers refers to this cemetery as the Ingalls Family Lot. Although this change may SEEM subtle and justified to some, changing this identity in official records will have a major impact in misdirecting researchers.

    Ironically many of my forum members gathered here to research in 2004, the same year this name change apparently took place in a survey.

Ray Viau, Rehoboth Resident and Webmaster for OldRehoboth.com

-----------------------

June 1, 2011

Selectman Costello’s Press Release Troubling   

       I find it interesting that Mr. Costello is offering a $2000 dollar reward, to find out who sent out a flier that contained information, that the State Inspector General determined to be factual. The last part of Mr. Costello’s press release is very troubling;  “ Those having any information should contact Detective Ramos at the Rehoboth Police Department by calling 508-252-3723.  “All leads will be confidential.””

    Since when is a Selectman allowed to use the Rehoboth Police Department as his own private detective service? The Inspector General’s report detailed specific incidents of criminal activity by Mr. Costello, why isn’t the Rehoboth Police department conducting an investigation of Mr. Costello?

    It is abundantly clear that Mr. Costello lacks the personal ethics and integrity to represent the citizens of Rehoboth. If Mr. Costello refuses to resign, all Rehoboth citizens should sign a recall petition.

    Where are all the individuals who identified themselves as ‘Concerned Rehoboth Citizens’?

Michael Powis, Rehoboth Citizen and Taxpayer

-----------------------

May 27, 2011

“Here we go . . . again.”

      Here we are...again.

     Costello's guilty? Maybe. Costello's not guilty? Maybe.

     Don Leffort, aka "The Investigator" in the Enos debacle, demanding Mike resign because he's embarrassing the town. Well, ain't that something.  Should I continue?

      I think not, because everyone knows the spiel I'd launch into. The so-called "Reform" bunch got a mouthful of sour grapes from the shellacking in the last election and they will go to any length to make things flow their way again, well it ain't happening.

      It seems a group of interlopers have decided they want things different for let's say . . . land development where big profits could be realized by manipulating the planning and zoning boards so they get, let's say, buildable lots out of wetlands.

     As far as I'm concerned the whole bunch of them can go back to East Providence and continue their RI politics. Stay out of Rehoboth.  We all know who you are. You're not going to win.

     The one referred to as the "Puppetmaster" should realize he got a lot of swamp land that he's not going to get to develop and just leave it at that. It's going to get worse before it gets better.

     And yes, I do know Costello a long time. Yep. What do I think of this investigation?  HOOEY!   Just like Leffort’s  investigation of Enos.

     Donny Leffort:  Has Mike Costello been charged with a crime?  I didn't hear you. What was that?  NO, you say?   Well, I'll be damned!

Ken Burns, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

May 26, 2011

“Mr. Costello must step aside until the matter is cleared.”

      Even after it was proven that Chief Enos did NOTHING ILLEGAL, there were petitions, signs, tons of letters.

    Where are the petitions now regarding Selectman Costello?  A convicted felon who has the keys to all the Town Buildings, who oversees the Police Dept. and the Town's operations, who has been spending time at the Senior Center. Where are the Concerned Citizen's who are so sure he is innocent, but should be asking that Mr. Costello step down until the charges have been cleared.  He deserves  at least the same treatment he has given Chief Enos who hasn't  even done anything illegal.  

    If Selectmen Costello and Tito are so concerned about appearances, as in the Chief's case, Mr. Costello must step aside until the matter is cleared.

    "Research the Facts then vote,"  "Mike Costello and Joe Tito are two men I know who are qualified to lead and are already proven servants to Rehoboth,"  "They lead by example and not by exception to our laws, and they will hold people accountable for their actions." "They know the true meaning of professional ethics and possess commonsense,"  "Determine the truth and don't be misled by false claims."

     These four statements above were made by Ex-Selectman Kevin McBride (who quit his position on the Board of Selectmen)  and printed in the March 2011 edition of the Rehoboth Reporter.

      "I am running for Selectman in the Town of Rehoboth because I want to restore integrity and respect to that office and to the 12,000 residents of Rehoboth. "My goal is to restore respect and dignity to the Board of Selectmen and to the Town of Rehoboth. These two statements were made by Selectman Costello in the March 2011 edition of the Rehoboth Reporter.

      How about trying to live up to some of these statements?

Pamela Christman, Resident Rural Rehoboth

-----------------------

May 25, 2011

Protocol and Procedure

    Selectman Mike Costello is embroiled in a situation no elected official wants to be in.  In fairness, Mr. Costello is entitled to a formal and impartial investigation by officials of the Department of Housing and all agencies connected with the lottery and subsequent purchase made by the Costellos at Judith Ann Circle.

    It will be extremely difficult for him to function in his capacity as selectman unless this inquiry takes place.  Mr. Costello’s ownership does have deed restrictions (deed rider) and these will have to be abided by. If Mr. Costello is not compliant with the deed restrictions he will need to do so as soon as possible.

    The formal inquiry that will occur is whether or not the application for inclusion in the lottery was accurate to the best knowledge of the Costellos, also Marie Costello’s proof of residency.

   It goes without saying that an initiative to determine if the lottery was fair with no favoritism should also be conducted. 

    Until the time of a formal inquiry, it may be surprising if Mr. Costello was to resign his duty as selectman.  Yet the Chief of Police of this town was not afforded the same protocol.  Mr. Enos has been relieved of specific duties as an investigation continues, initiated by personnel that he supervises. 

     If Mr. Costello is found to have violated the lottery’s procedure in the original application and subsequent appeal, he should resign or be removed by recall.

John Kiepler, Rehoboth Resident for 29 Years

-----------------------

May 25, 2011

Follow Up to Costello-gate

      Mr. Costello cites "my CORI has no record" and "there is nothing on my CORI".  

     True statements from Mr. Costello (maybe the first truthful statements he has uttered). Unfortunately, a CORI only takes into consideration the past 10 years and Mr. Costello has two prior criminal convictions predating this period; one for check fraud and another for knowingly receiving stolen property (a felony for which he was sentenced to a 3 years suspended sentence and 1 year probation with restitution (Commonwealth of MA vs Michael Costello to which he pleads GUILTY on 3/16/1992).

       It is time for this individual to face reality for once in his life and step aside.  

   It gets even better, today he writes that now he wants us to believe that he has evidence of his appropriate acquisition of his Horton Estate residence.  Funny, he did not have any of this "evidence" over the past several months while the MA IG's office was taking his sworn testimony during deposition sessions.  Perhaps he just forgot where he put them - right?  

     Mr. Costello, save the residents of Rehoboth, even the "concerned" ones, any more of your lies and deceit and move on.  Better yet, take your act to RI where politicians like you are welcomed with open arms.

Jim Anderson - A Reformer who is truly a concerned about the integrity of our town

-----------------------

May 23, 2011

To The People of Rehoboth

    There have been several recent attempts to malign me and my reputation.  Most are aware of flyers that have been distributed to Rehoboth residents that contain statements that are untrue.  I received an unsigned letter at my house that contained profanity and threatening language.  These actions have been initiated by my political enemies and I have proof of this that will be available soon.

A complaint has been filed against me with a state agency by Mr. Neal J. MacDonald of Dighton, MA alleging an inappropriate property transaction. This complaint was initiated by Chris Morra. (I have documents too these claims.) I promise each and every resident of Rehoboth that when the allegations in that complaint are thoroughly investigated, it will be clear that I did not participate in any wrongdoing and my name and reputation will be cleared.  

I want to apologize to my mother, Marie Costello, for exposing her to the ugliness of our town politics. My mother is fighting cancer and on 14 medications and we all know what meds can do to your ability to function.  She is devastated by the accusations made against her and believes that the report is untrue and her comments documented in that report were taken out of context and with threats of being removed from her home.

As a point of information, the Horton Estate development, a 40B, by John Duvally, is governed and controlled by the State. All submissions and subsequent approvals are with the state and not the local planning board.  The Planning board was not involved or had any say in this development.  Therefore, no member of the Planning Board or myself ever voted on this project.  Let me make it clear that my mother did live in Horton Estates, as many of you are aware and I have the proof as well.  I paid for any upgrades on the house and have the documents to prove it. 

I have obtained a lawyer and my family and I will fight these false allegation made against us. I will also start looking at bringing suit against people in town like Mr. Foley for making false statements on televised news reports and in print about a criminal past, show me the proof because I have proof there is none. This is a difficult time for me, my family, and the Town of Rehoboth.  I will work tirelessly to clear my name and reputation, and I need to continue to move this Town forward in the right direction.

Mike Costello - Chairman Rehoboth Board of Selectmen

-----------------------

May 9, 2011

New Online Discussion Forum for Anything School Related

       A new online discussion forum has been launched that will be dedicated to anything school-related in Rehoboth. Electronic communication is so prevalent in today’s society that it seems like a very worthwhile experiment to get more people involved with what’s going on in our schools.    

     The forum is a part of my own website and although I am a member of the DR School Committee, this forum is not an official channel of the DR School District and any comments posted in the forum do not represent the views or opinions of the DR School Committee as a whole.

     The goal of the forum is to share thoughts, concerns, and ideas regarding public education in Rehoboth and provide a common ground where parents, teachers, administrators, and taxpayers can learn about concerns outside of their own group.

    You do not need to log in to the forum to read postings but you will need to register if you want to post your own comments. The forum rules require that everyone must use their real name as their user name when they register. This policy is intended to encourage responsibility with the content of the postings and discourage the use of personal attacks and/or slander. 

   The current plan is that the forum will run throughout the summer and be evaluated in the fall. The URL for the discussion forum is: http://drforum.prhebda.com.

     I encourage all Rehoboth residents to check out the forum and feel free to contact me with any comments thoughts or suggestions.

Peter Hebda, Member of the Dighton-Rehoboth School Committee

-----------------------

May 4, 2011

Understanding the Significance of the CORI Warrant Article

   On the April 4, 2011 ballot a non-binding referendum question requiring C.O.R.I. checks of all elected and appointed officials passed by an over two to one majority unlike that of Town Meeting last November.  The language of the new article is to be voted on at our May 16 Town Meeting followed by a General Assembly final approval to become town bylaw.   

    In order to make a well informed decision regarding this issue it is important for you, the voters of Rehoboth, to understand the significance and relevance of what this all means to us as a Town. 

    C.O.R.I. is the acronym for Criminal Offense Records Information administered by the Massachusetts Department of Criminal Justice Information Services (D.C.J.I.S.).  It is designed to give employers, organizations, and municipalities the ability to do criminal background checks on individuals who would be entrusted with the care of minors, seniors, confidential and/or financial information, etc.

    We, as the citizens and taxpayers of our Town have the right to know who represents us in government.  It should be their obligation to us, in my opinion and apparently the opinion of the majority of the voters who voted in favor of this, in the spirit of transparency, for officials and potential officials to submit to a C.O.R.I. check before serving on any board or committee. 

   It is important to note that this requirement should not be designed to discourage individuals from serving.  The Town’s intent should also not be to disqualify someone based on a past misdemeanor or mistake in which many years have passed allowing time to learn from such an indiscretion.  It is the serious criminal offenders in whom the Town should have concerns. 

     Individuals committing offenses of a felonious nature within 10 – 15 years of a CORI application must be deemed ineligible from serving in most cases.  All CORI checks are confidential and would only be reviewed by CORI certified board members comprised of a cross section of townspeople coordinated by the Police Department and Town Administrator’s office.   

  The D.C.J.I.S. has a Model CORI Policy which can be viewed on their website and for purposes of correct dissemination of information I will refer to it here.  It states, “Unless otherwise provided by law, a criminal record will not automatically disqualify an applicant. Rather, determinations of suitability based on CORI checks will be made consistent with this policy and any applicable law or regulations.” 

    It goes on to say, “If the (Town) reasonably believes the record belongs to the applicant and is accurate, based on the information as provided . . . then the determination of suitability for the position will be made. Unless otherwise provided by law, factors considered in determining suitability may include, but not be limited to the following:

(a) Relevance of the crime to the position sought;

(b) The nature of the work to be performed;

(c) Time since the conviction;

(d) Age of the candidate at the time of the offense;

(e) Seriousness and specific circumstances of the offense;

(f) The number of offenses;

(g) Whether the applicant has pending charges;

(h) Any relevant evidence of rehabilitation or lack thereof;

(i) Any other relevant information, including information submitted by the

candidate or requested by the hiring authority”

    At the last November Town Meeting a CORI check article was the topic of much heated discussion.  Two individuals who spoke out strongly against this article are the two newly elected members of the Board of Selectmen, Joe Tito and Mike Costello.  Now, as a former elected town official, I am aware that you do not give up the right to your opinion once elected.  However, as a selectmen, it is incumbent upon you to fulfill your fiduciary obligation as advocates of the voting citizenry of the town to represent their intentions, especially given that your whole campaign was based on the will of the people.

    My question to you Mr. Tito and Mr. Costello is this: Will you fulfill your campaign promise of transparency and doing the peoples’ work even though it is against your biased opinions of CORI checks?  This is your opportunity to show true character by representing us, your constituents, who overwhelmingly voted for this article.  Encourage your supporters to uphold the will of the majority yielding to what is in the town’s best interest.

Ronald Reagan once said, “Trust but verify.”  My analysis of this past election illustrates this notion extremely well! 

    Rehoboth Town Meeting is Monday, May 16, 2011.  I ask all those who came out in record numbers for the town election and voted overwhelmingly in favor of the CORI check referendum to come to support it by your vote once again.  This is where the town government’s great divide exists; the disparity between votes of 300 in attendance at Town Meeting versus 3,600 votes at the ballot booths on Election Day. 

   This is your opportunity to listen, watch and participate in what some call “the purest form of government.”  That remains to be seen based on the outcome of this vote, but more important by your commitment to carry out your intentions by way of your Town Meeting vote and participation.

Jim Paon, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

May 2, 2011

“No Confidence Vote, A Serious Matter. ”

   After reading an article in the Taunton Gazette, and Selectman Leffort’s comment trivializing the no confidence vote of the two police unions in town, I had to respond. 

   The police chief is entrusted with not only public safety but administrating the policies and procedures of the police officers.  How could the two unions have any confidence in the person who is responsible for enforcement of those policies when he violated many of the police policies himself? 

    Also recently, it came to light through the Jim Hummel investigation, that the police chief was out of the office many times yet was paid his weekly salary. No indication on his time sheet that he was using vacation, sick or personal time for his absences.  Even though this was brought forward, Selectman Leffort, the liaison to the police department did nothing to confirm or deny that this was true. 

    It also came to light that all lines at the police department are recorded lines, however, no message or warning was given to the other party informing them that their conversation was recorded.  The police chief had access to all the recordings and would have known that the other party had not been informed.  The recorded line was apparently installed some 2 years ago.  Once again, Selectman Leffort did nothing. 

  Then we hear that Jim Hummel requested a recording from the police department where the police chief uses his cell phone to call the dispatcher to find the address of a plate he ran while in Pawtucket.  He spent 4 ½ minutes on the phone getting street by street directions to the house. 

    Why? He has no jurisdiction in Pawtucket. Why didn’t he call the Pawtucket police if he observed a violation, if that’s why he was running the plate?  It took 52 days to get this tape released, so obviously Selectman Leffort knew of the request and you would think as liaison and given all the issues with the chief and the vote of no confidence, he would have done something. But apparently, Selectman Leffort did nothing.

   Selectman Leffort did provide an “investigation” of the December incident where the chief was found lying in a driveway, crying “kill me,” and “I want to die.”   His investigation reported that he had taken a half of Vicoden at 2pm and then had a rum and coke and had an allergic reaction to the Vicoden.   His fellow selectman, Chairman Foley, was satisfied with the investigation and no action was taken against the police chief.  So why did they go to an outside investigation?  Did Mr. Foley and Mr. Leffort who voted to go to an outside investigation, have no confidence in his own investigation of the police chief?

    A vote of no confidence of the two police unions was never addressed by the previous board of selectman. Why?  A vote of no confidence by our police officers is a serious matter and must be addressed to insure public safety.  Why wouldn’t you want to know of any other incidents with the police chief that would question his ability to lead his officers and provide public safety to all the Rehoboth residents?   Given the issues stated above, is it any wonder why the police unions voted they have no confidence in the police chief?  

   The chief has lost all credibility as well as the ability to lead.  He must be removed.  Rehoboth deserves better.

Brad Doyle, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

April 3, 2011

“ . . . send a message that the Reform party is irrelevant and must go. ”

    Throughout it's history this country has been blessed with many political parties with a multitude of possible solutions on how to run this country, state , and town. Because of the variety ideas put forth, problems that some times seem insurmountable are almost always resolved. On rare occasions however, a party will come into power that offers nothing to anyone but a select few.

    That is the case of the Reform party of Rehoboth. This organization came into power in 2006, and in the five years since has done absolutely nothing for the town other than benefit the leaders of the party.

      It has stooped to levels unheard of by any citizen alive today. Fliers have been sent out days before the election attacking Mike Costello with lies about his volunteerism, family, lifestyle, and residency at Horton Estates.  One was authored by a coward who refused to sign it, one was signed by Selectman Ken Foley, who is running against Mr. Costello. Swift action by the trustees of Horton Estates have repudiated those lies.

     They also put forth candidates who are utterly unqualified to run our town. Neither Mr. Foley or Mr. Paon have offered any credible solutions to solve our problems. Mr. Foley has done nothing but spew forth venom at anyone who dares challenge him. The hatred and and anger that he exhibits is unbelievable. Laws governing conduct in public office do not exist as far as he is concerned. All elected officials are required to take an ethics test which he failed to do. Selectman are not allowed to represent people before regulatory boards, which he did, (Conservation Commission 2009). Removing qualified people on the ZBA and replacing them with his followers has already borne fruit (Francis Farm expanding on land with residence only covenants).

      Jim Paon is unknowledgeable and unconcerned with most things he talks to people about. He never filled out a talent bank form for the Conservation Commission, over a nine month period missed every site walk and only attended three meeting. We schedule two meetings and two site walks per month. Two meetings had to be cancelled because of him. His only participation was to make a motion to meet once a month; a little homework would have shown we are required by the state to meet twice a month. He has stated that he would commission a master plan committee. We have a master plan, Mike Costello, myself and seventy other volunteers were part of it, where was Mr. Paon? He claims that as a small businessman he is qualified to be a selectman. How does a tiny jewelry store compare with a town with many departments, schools, local, state and federal regulations? How many personnel negotiations does he tackle? One current selectman is a small business man who claims he has no time to be a selectman.

     Mr Paon is on the school committee, his children attended our schools, yet he does not know what grades are in Palmer River or Beckwith. Ms. Ballents is also on the school committee and yet she does not know how are schools are funded.

     Our town governed by the vote of the people at Town Meeting. None of the Reformers think that is relevant and have chosen to ignore it. This election the voters need to send a message that the Reform party is irrelevant and must go. Please join me in electing Mike Costello, Joe Tito and two of the non-Reform candidates to the school committee; Peter Hebda, Tiffany Bartholemew or Chris Cooper.

Robert Materne, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

April 2, 2011

“Lies Lies Lies Lies”

    On Friday April 1, some in Town received a mailing which you thought was mailed from the residents of Horton Estate. Well it was not, it was mailed from my opponent Ken Foley's camp. From the beginning of this campaign, I have told you what I will do for you as your Selectman without negativity.

     My opponent Ken Foley has told you if elected he will do nothing WHY because they spend all there time lying about me and my family. For 22 years all I wanted to do was help this Town and the people who live in it. Below is a letter from the Horton Estates Trustees telling you what most of you already knew the mailer was a lie. Please on April 4 vote for the Os Joe Tito and Mike Costello.

Mike Costello, Candidate for Rehoboth Board of Selectmen

EDITOR’S NOTE:  Below is a letter submitted by Mike Costello on Saturday, April 2, 2011. Within the body of his letter he included an unsigned letter from a third party that could not be verified by RehobothNow at publish time.  So the text of that third party letter is not included.

----------------------- 

April 1, 2011

“Please join my husband and I and vote ‘yes’ on the Three to Five.”

    Mr. Deignan’s  article from March 30, 2011 requires a response. Mr. Diegnan claims that one of the non-binding questions this Monday asks the voters to provide guidance on the three to five  selectmen article. He put “non-binding” in quotation marks implying they are not non-binding. They are in fact by definition non-binding; however, I have been told by Selectman Foley that he intends to kill this legislation before it comes back for a “voter acceptance” vote if it is voted down in the non-binding vote.  He had also stated as such in his letter to both Representative Howitt and Senator Timilty.

     Mr. Deignan then mentions the ballot question and “its parent article” has been the source of much strife.  I contend that the Article itself has caused little strife.  During a debate at our own Concerned Citizens meeting, everyone was calm and polite and we listened to each other’s views with interest. While the Article itself has not been the source of strife, the handling of the approved warrant article and the ballot question has become the source of much strife.  If the Board of Selectmen had followed its own vote of December 6, 2010, had Selectman Foley not stopped it’s progression on December 7th or had the Selectman followed the advice of Town Counsel written on January 7, 2011; there would have been no strife.

     Both the Attorney General and our own Town Counsel have agreed that the General Court has been historically reluctant to approve a drastic change in government structure without a local acceptance clause. While the General Court has, in the past, required a local acceptance provision, lately the legislature has approved changes in the size of a town’s Board of Selectmen without a local acceptance provision.   I have been on record, both at Town Meeting, during later discussions, and in a letter that is on the Concerned Citizens website; that a local acceptance provision should be included. In a curious turn of events, the current Board of Selectmen has requested that our Town Counsel sent to our representatives, Mr. Howitt and Mr. Timilty language that would provide for an increase from 3 to 5 and require a local acceptance provision as we wanted all along.  One thing we don’t agree on:  There should be a BINDNG vote, but only after the General Court has acted.

     Mr. Diegnan’s claims that this article was either “off the cuff”, “feel good legislation” or was it non-contemplative.  I disagree wholeheartedly.  There are those who could tell Mr. Diegnan that I have been interested in this increase since 2003, but I did not get much support.  This legislation was put before Town Meeting after much forethought and research, after 150 voter signed the petition, and after a significant revision before Town Meeting .  In fact, almost 75% of all towns our size have five Selectman.  It is not that unusual. 

      The increase from 3 to 5 selectmen is a possible solution for several problems.  Less work per Selectman, more ideas brought by five,  less votes being put off due to recusals, and hopefully, to lessen the ability of any one group from holding the “majority” of the Board. 

     I have lived in Rehoboth for most of my 55 years.  My husband and I have combined efforts to never miss a town meeting, even while raising three children and two grandchildren, whether it was at Palmer River or  at DR.   Voters who attend Town Meeting need to be admired. They are willing to take time to make a difference.  They do not deserve to be ignored. 

     Please join my husband and I and vote “yes” on the Three to Five.

Bonnie Kelley, Founder of Rehoboth Concerned Citizens

-----------------------

April 1, 2011

“I would like to respond to Chris Cooper’s letter . . .”

       I would like to respond to Chris Cooper’s letter and specifically his claim that I used quotes and sentiments from his RBA speech on March 15 without attribution. The best way I can do this is to provide a brief description of where each piece of my letter came from.

     First, the title of the letter was assigned by RehobothNow or the Sun Chronicle and was not provided by me. The question at the beginning of my letter was asked of me at the “Meet the Candidates” event held at Francis Farm this past Sunday, March 27. The answer I gave in my first paragraph reflected the sentiments from my own speech at the RBA night on March 15. It also bothers me that the division in town is usually portrayed as side “A” vs. side “B” and I believe that most people aren’t interested on being on any side.

     The second paragraph reflects my thoughts from attending the Fireman’s Ball held on Saturday March 26, so I assume there is no conflict there.

     The third paragraph specifically refers to the outcome of the past November’s special Town Meeting and the ongoing controversy that has persisted since that time. I find it troubling that citizens in our town that have organized to become more involved in our government, and have followed the rules of our town, are being blamed for everything bad in our town.  It’s a sad day when being a “concerned citizen” is considered a bad thing.

     The last paragraph sums up my thoughts on Monday March 28. Since the RBA night 13 days prior, I have had many opportunities to talk with people in Rehoboth and have met a lot of good people. Some people I spoke with had volunteered their time to the town only to be summarily dismissed for no good reason. Between working full time, taking care of my family, and running a campaign for school committee, I do not remember everyone’s words verbatim. If Mr. Cooper believes that I used quotes that were uniquely his, then I apologize. I can honestly say that everything in my letter came from my own personal experience and from the people I have had a chance to talk with and for that, I believe no apology is necessary.

Peter Hebda, Candidate for D-R Regional School Committee

-----------------------

April 1, 2011

“ . . . we can mark the end of ‘mud season’ on April 4.”

       True to the saying about local politics being vastly similar to “mud wrestling”, Rehoboth has had its fair share slung about, especially these past few days.  

     I will trust that most folks here in town see through the muddy and somewhat malicious slinging of the Reformers as it is: “A desperate attempt by desperate people who, have chosen to apply selective authority to retain control, while subscribing to a notion that “they” know what is best for the town.” I will also trust that when most folks go to vote, they have made a conscientious assessment to avoid “that mud”. Rather, they will have made a decision with careful deliberation of whom, or for what they support.  

   Fortunately we have good alternatives with candidates who have steeled themselves from descending into the “mud” pit. They are instead, representative of a positive force for how town governance can represent the will of the people;

   Board of Selectman candidates Mike Costello and Joe Tito are “Right for Rehoboth now”.  The DR School System deserves the same attention and would receive it with Peter Hebda, Tiffany Bartholomew, and Chris Cooper.

     All of these candidates have the capacity (competency) to do the job and, regard for the trust (confidence) we – the people – seek when we cast our vote. Please reject those candidates who lack character and competency and, who will continue to infringe upon our integrity, both as citizens and voters. 

     Yes, it is April, and while northern New England still has yet to feel the thaw, here in Rehoboth, we can mark the end of “mud season” on April 4th.  Feel the thaw for yourself. Get out and vote.

Capt Steven B. Sammis, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 31, 2011

Take Back Rehoboth.

     Hello fellow taxpayers. I am writing this letter not only as Rehoboth’s Tree Warden, but as a Concerned Citizen. I am very concerned for our town. “We Want It All Back” was the saying for Rehoboth’s 350th celebration. We simulated taking back the towns that once were part of Rehoboth.  We the citizens of Rehoboth need to take control and take back the dignity and civility we once had. We also want back the respect for annual town meeting and respect for taxpayers. We want it all.

    At last years annual town meeting, our current selectmen Foley made an amendment to zero out the Forestry Budget, which was seconded by Selectmen Leffort. I would have been expected to go out day and night in all kinds of weather to secure the safety of Rehoboth roads for no pay at all. I was thankful the taxpayers unanimously voted against the recommendation by Selectmen Foley and Leffort. We need selectmen that think through a situation and not make decisions based on personal agendas.

      This can change by your vote on Monday, April 4.

      I have renewed hope, and I am encouraged to have the O’s, Joe Tito and Mike Costello running for selectmen.  I am very impressed with Joe and Mike. They have proven to have the knowledge and experience to help restore the damage done to our town. They show respect for people, have the intelligence to make decisions, and they have non bias views.

     Joe and Mike have the taxpayer’s best interest at heart. I feel that our town government will be in the capable and reliable hands of Joe and Mike.  They have proven to have the ability to comprehend problems and will use common sense to solve them. They will listen to taxpayers and work with us to respectfully handle a situation. They will openly communicate and welcome taxpayer input.

    Our voice will be heard. Please vote for a change. Both Mike Costello and Joe Tito need to get elected to stop the turmoil that our current selectmen are putting us through. 

    I have had the opportunity to get acquainted with Tiffany Bartholomew and Peter Hebda. Both are running for School Committee. They seem to be dedicated and sincere. With children in our school system, they will have a hands on reason to want the best school system for Rehoboth children. I believe they are capable and will be an excellent addition to our School Committee.

     What a winning slate of candidates we have.  Help our town help itself by voting for Joe Tito, Mike Costello, Tiffany Bartholomew and Peter Hebda.

TAKE BACK REHOBOTH

 William E. Dalpe, Rehoboth Tree Warden

-----------------------

March 31, 2011

Rehoboth deserves honesty and integrity.

     It’s definitely election time in Rehoboth, once again the Reformers and their public relations company are running a negative campaign with lies and character assassinations.

   Mr Foley who is running for the three year term of selectman can be seen pleading for re-election everywhere. He’s shown being interviewed by another candidate, where he talks a lot but says nothing of what he’s going to do. All I hear is whining about some developer. You also are a developer, Mr. Foley.

    You can hear him tell how he was instrumental in saving the tax payers over one million dollars on the High School septic system. Where are those savings you talk about?  The septic system came in around the original bid amount.  And if it had been funded through a debt exclusion, we would have over 100,000 available to fund the town’s operating budget.  I haven’t heard how you are planning on closing the budget deficit yet.

    I know the State is investigating a few of our Police officers for running CORI checks on Mr. Morra. Why not tell the whole story? Mr. Morra was speeding and when stopped didn’t have a Mass drivers license yet his vehicle was registered in Rehoboth. The officer let him go with a warning to get his Mass license. The checks were to see if he did. The officers were doing their job.  

    The lawsuits are because one man while serving as a selectman abused his office to constantly harass a developer in town. He had plenty of help. Yet when both that former selectman and you, Mr. Foley, violate our current by laws and zoning regulations and are caught, you cry foul.   

    Mr. Foley, you totally ignored the covenants of the housing development and even pulled a permit for the wrong address yet you still got what you wanted. I for one am still wondering why?  It seems that we have something in common with East Providence. You don’t care about that neighborhood either.

    Mr Foley,  Rehoboth deserves Honesty and Integrity from those that sit on our boards and committee’s which is why I will support Mike and Joe for Selectman.

Yesterday I was a thug and a vigilante but everyday I’m a concerned Citizen.

Richard S. Barrett , Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 31, 2011

Focusing on the positive.

     Over the past month and a half I’ve been campaigning for a position on the Dighton-Rehoboth School Committee.  My position has been, and still is, that the division within our town needs to end, and that the focus of the school committee needs to be on our children, and not on political agendas.  I am not running with a party or other political affiliation, but as the father of my two children, Chase and Evelyn.  It is for them and for the children in our town that I seek election, in order to improve the current standing of the Dighton-Rehoboth School district.

      I first voiced these opinions at the Rehoboth Business Association’s Candidate Forum several weeks ago (video available at http://voteforcooper.weebly.com).  I was therefore surprised to read Peter Hebda’s recent editorial in The Sun Chronicle where he used both quotes and the general sentiments addressed in my speech without attribution. 

    They say that imitation is the greatest form of flattery.  Whether or not that is true, I am pleased and encouraged that my message is getting out and being embraced by people, including my opponent.  Whether I am elected or not on April 4t, I hope that my ideas will carry on and be put into action after the election.

Chris Cooper, Rehoboth Resident and Candidate for Dighton-Rehoboth School Committee

-----------------------

March 30, 2011

Vote No on Three-to-Five.

    One of the "non-binding" ballot questions for voters this Monday asks the voters in Town to weigh in on the '3-to-5' Selectmen controversy, born out of a "citizen petition" warrant article authored by Ms. Bonnie Kelley. Voting "Yes" means you support the change in Rehoboth's governmental structure, while voting "No" means you support the existing structure of the Board of Selectmen.

    This ballot question, and its parent warrant article, has been the source of much strife in Town over the past several months. On Town Meeting floor, Ms. Kelley informed the attendees that even if the article passed by Town Meeting vote, the General Court would still require a "local acceptance provision" (meaning, the General Court would only allow the change to occur if the citizens agreed in a Town-wide ballot question on the issue) in order for the change to be enacted.

    However, despite Ms. Kelley's good intentions, this claim turned out to be factually incorrect. It was subsequently determined that the General Court may, or may not, place a local acceptance provision in the article.

    Simply put: if the General Court approves the change with no local acceptance provision (as currently authored by Ms. Kelley), then your Town government will expand from 3 to 5 Selectmen without you having a say, if you were one of the 6,800+ registered voters in Rehoboth who were unable to attend Town Meeting in November.

     These facts were further supported at the last "Concerned Citizens" meeting in March, where Ms. Kelley, organizer of the group, informed the people in attendance that she had spoken to Rehoboth's state representative and senator – Messieurs Howitt and Timilty -- who informed her that although the ballot question on Monday is "non-binding", more than likely the General Court would look at the outcome of the vote to determine whether or not to approve the "3 to 5 Selectmen" article she authored.

      In a sense, our "non-binding" ballot question has now become "binding" in the eyes of the General Court.

    Unfortunately, with all the other strife in town, little attention has been paid to this important issue. No contemplative rationale has been forthcoming on why a change from 3 to 5 Selectmen is necessary. A few justifications made for supporting its passage -- there would be "less work" for the Selectmen; with 5 selectmen we would get more 'diverse' opinions; if there are 5 Selectmen there are fewer voters per Selectman to represent -- are all weak and not very well thought out, more the result of emotion from those who have been frustrated in a variety of ways by issues facing our Town government rather than by a serious study of the needs in its governing structure.

     While modifications in our form of government may be warranted as time progresses and the Town's demographics change and grow, making "off the cuff" changes to our government based upon the vote of a little over 100 people is haphazard and foolhardy. The law of unintended consequences is alive and well when "feel good" legislation is proposed and passed. The proposed change from Ms. Kelley falls into this category.

     Rather, such changes to our government structure should be carefully studied, the pros and cons considered with serious thought, and then a formal proposal made to the citizens of the Rehoboth via a Town-wide ballot question where all voters may weigh in with their opinion via their vote, not the few who are able to attend Town Meeting on a work/school-night where life's demands more often intrude than not.

      For these reasons, it is important when you go to the polls on Monday, you vote "NO" on the '3-to-5' ballot article.

Michael P. Deignan, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 30, 2011

With the election of Mike and Joe, the sun will once again rise in Rehoboth.

     Good people of Rehoboth…April 4th is fast approaching.  A decision must be made regarding which direction we choose for our town.  Do we want to move forward, or do we continue in a downward spiral?

    Ken Foley is running on his record of lack of leadership; failed to control legal fees which are 50% (40K) over budget, failed in a timely manner the implementation of  town meeting vote, failed to implement a Capital Plan for our town, failed to appoint a much needed Personnel Board, failed to resurrect the Revenue Committee, failed to address the Town’s unfunded liability of 600K, failed to acknowledge multiple letters of concerns from our town’s seniors, failed to get Town Meeting approval and a competitive bid before purchasing a dump truck for 100K, failed to lead the way for thousands of dollars in cost savings through consolidation and structural changes of Town Government, and failed to overcome his lack of leadership by continuing to blame others for his shortcomings as evidenced by his recent campaign flyer.

    Jim Paon who has served three years on the School Committee has not figured out that the 4th grade is not at Beckwith School.  While serving on the Conservation Committee Jim attended less than half the scheduled meetings.  Don’t be fooled by his superficial bling of the setting sun. We have all experienced what happens with the diminishing light at sunset.  We have been left in the dark for the past year.

    Mike Costello and Joe Tito have integrity!  With the election of Mike and Joe, the sun will once again rise in Rehoboth!  They will re-instate open government with all residents treated fairly and as equals.  Mike and Joe are committed to returning the voice of the people back to town government. 

    Please get out and vote!  May we once again have the light of day shine upon Rehoboth to create a vision and transparency for a brighter tomorrow.

      Elect Mike Costello and Joe Tito for Selectmen!

Lorraine Botts, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 30, 2011

I hope you will join me in voting for Chris Cooper.

      I served on the Dighton Rehoboth Regional School Committee for 12 years, twice as chairman.  I’ve spent a total of 38 years in education as a teacher, counselor and principal.  Those experiences give me a good knowledge of the qualities that an individual needs to make an effective school committee member.  An individual’s education, a desire to serve the community and, most importantly, his or her objective to see each child reach his or her highest potential are essential traits in a school committee member.  I see these traits in Chris Cooper, candidate for the Regional School Committee. 

    Chris has a doctoral degree from Worcester Polytechnic Institute.  He is clearly both intelligent and well-educated.  He has been an adjunct professor at Assumption College and Worcester State College so he knows what it is like to teach and can clearly understand the concerns of both teachers and students. Chris’s older child will begin kindergarten in 2 years indicating that Chris has a very long-term interest in what is best for the students of Dighton and Rehoboth.  He is married to Kathy Dennen Cooper who graduated from the Dighton Rehoboth Regional District. He has familiarity with the District and has deep roots in Rehoboth. 

    Chris is a process development chemist currently researching medicines to treat a form of cancer that affects children.  Clearly he knows how to approach and solve problems. 

    Chris Cooper will have my vote for a school committee position on April 4.  I hope you will join me in voting for Chris Cooper.

Mary Beth Moriarty, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 30, 2011

Elect Jim Paon, Selectman.

   A jeweler is an individual who makes his living by creating an unbreakable bond of trust with his customers. People walk into his store on a daily basis and entrust him with their valuables, often times more valuable in the memories they hold than in actual monetary value they possess. In Rehoboth, we need a Selectman with these qualities -- an individual in whom we can entrust the business of our Town while maintaining the characteristics that we hold so dear about Rehoboth; its rural charm, historical significance, and the restoration of our sense of community that seems to have been lost along the way.

     Jim Paon is such an individual. A 19-year resident of the Town, Jim has worked diligently over the past three years as your School Committee representative to better the quality of education in Rehoboth. Oftentimes he has taken unpopular positions, such as holding administrators and teachers accountable for their performance, because in his heart he felt this was the correct position to take, despite political pressures to the contrary.

     Two years ago Jim fought hard against the replacement septic system at the High School, because he firmly believed the existing system could be rehabbed for a fraction of the price. In the end, Jim demonstrated he is capable of something many elected officials are incapable of doing today -- the ability to listen to the "other side" and reach a compromise -- a compromise which provided a new septic system to the high school, for roughly one-half the cost of the original proposal. Thanks to Jim's leadership, the community as a whole won.

    Jim will bring these same qualities, the same level-headed analysis and common-sense decision-making approach he exhibited on the School Committee to the Board of Selectmen. When opinions on the Board differ, he will find a way to bridge the gap, to find a common sense solution, just as he has done on the School Committee.

   This year, the Town is facing a $465,000 budget deficit. As a self-employed businessman, operating a family business for 20 years, Jim understands the differences between the "must haves" and "wants". He understands the need to fund critical business needs. He can balance the needs of all Town departments, while continuing to support the School Department to improve the quality of education in Rehoboth, with the limited funding we have available today.

     Rehoboth needs an elected official who will listen to the needs of the community, take into account the opinions of all the voters -- not just "this" side or "that" side -- and make decisions which he feels are in the best interests of the community as a whole. Our town needs an elected representative without a hidden agenda, who will put the Town, and not the needs of developers and special interest groups, first.

    Rehoboth needs a man we can trust. A gentleman of principle who will not compromise his integrity for personal or political gain.

    Rehoboth needs Jim Paon.

    I encourage you, my fellow Rehoboth residents, to turn out on Election Day and cast your vote for Jim.

Michael P. Deignan, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 29, 2011

Focus on the Positive.

  As a candidate for School Committee in Rehoboth, I was recently asked what “side” I was on. As far as the School Committee goes, all children in our town will attend the same school based on their age so my first answer is that we can’t let the political divides that exist in the town affect the decisions for the school children. As I thought about this more, there seems to be a tendency for people to want to neatly fit everyone into some sort of category so that they know where everyone stands. Unfortunately, life is seldom that simple to be able to do that.

     I attended the Rehoboth Call Firefighters Ball on Saturday night at the Venus de Milo Restaurant and I was impressed with all of the men and women who volunteer their time and talent to staff our fire stations and are ready to respond when the call goes out. They don’t ask what “side” someone is on, they just respond and do what they need to do to get the job done. It was a positive night for Rehoboth and we haven’t had a lot of those lately.

    What we do hear about in Rehoboth are the things that people think are wrong with our town and in some cases our townspeople. We have by-laws in place and if anyone doesn’t like the way our town is run, then they are free to find out what the process is to change the by-laws, then take the necessary steps to make it happen. Those that follow the rules and meet the requirements of our by-laws deserve due process, and no one should stand in their way or try to negate their efforts. It doesn’t matter what the issue is, the same by-laws and procedures apply to everyone regardless of what “side” you are on.

    I think a lot of the residents of Rehoboth have heard enough of the negative side and it’s time for us to focus on the positive. We have a lot of good people in this town and I think the vast majority of us are fortunate to be able to live here. If we want good people to come forward and volunteer their time and talent, then we need to create an environment where their efforts are positively recognized. We need to understand that we won’t always agree on everything, but we need to maintain our civility and mutual respect.

    So to anyone that wants to know, I am on the positive side – and I believe better days are ahead for Rehoboth. The election in Rehoboth is on Monday April 4 so please remember to vote.

Peter Hebda, Rehoboth Resident and candidate for D-R School Committee

-----------------------

March 28, 2011

Role of Selectmen

  It’s important that you vote for a Selectman who will represent the wishes of the people respectfully whether they agree with them or not.   Violation of our bylaws, open meeting laws, slanderous, name calling does not represent the town well.  No one should feel threatened in speaking out and voicing their opinion.

    As you head to the polls to vote for the Selectman of your choice.  Take a look at the candidates and make your decision on who will best represent the voters of the town.     Jim Paon is running for the one year selectman term.  On Jim’s website, Jim “recommends restoring the Council on Aging line item reduced  by  the Finance Committee which forced the COA to close its doors on Fridays”.   The board of Selectman submitted the budget to the finance committee which eliminated the full time, benefit position.  The Finance committee recommended this at town meeting and TOWN MEETING VOTED FOR IT.  It’s disturbing that Jim is already blaming someone else, has the wrong facts, and then makes up the conclusion.  The reduction of a full time coordinator did not force the COA to close on Friday, the COA board made that decision.

   I’ve been told that Jim posted on the unmoderated blog, under his previous alias of Rocky Balboa, “You are delusional not to mention seriously misguided and misinformed it’s really too bad.  You have so much potential.  Get the facts before you fall on the sword for ANYONE.  You’ll know soon enough…God help you.” and  “For those of you who have been waiting for the “facts” to come out?  Well, today’s the day folks. Set your TIVO and DVR to WJAR Channel  10 6:00p.m. News.  Oh, and Lorraine, be sure to let Bonnie know that this is what I was cautioning her about.  It’s not about intimidation; it’s about FACTS.  Let the backpedalling begin.”

  Do we really want another Selectman that blames others, doesn’t respect town meeting vote, and sends threatening messages to intimidate those that speak out?  Haven’t we already seen what that does to our town?   Jim used town board member emails to send out the message, regarding the breaking news on channel 10, the allegations by Chris Morra that illegal background checks were done on him OVER FOUR YEARS AGO?  Since Ken Foley and Chris Morra were the only ones interviewed for this story, how did Jim know about it BEFORE it aired?  He said he’s independent and not “beholden”.  Didn’t we hear that before? You may have seen Jim’s illuminated billboard, a lifesize picture of himself being carted around town on a trailer.  Why would you spend that kind of money for a one year position that pays nothing?  Is it about the power?   Aren’t we done with those that seek office for control and power?  The role of the Selectman is to ADMINISTER THE VOTE OF THE PEOPLE, not their personal agenda or someone else’s.  It’s important that you vote for a Selectman who will represent the wishes of the people respectfully whether they agree with them or not.

   Vote for JOE TITO, for the one year Selectman position.  He respects town meeting vote.  He respects your vote. He will listen to all residents.  He will make decisions in the best interest of the town and according to town meeting vote.  His priority will be the TOWN’S  priority, not the priority of a single group or single person. He will bring professionalism, civility, independence and leadership to the board of Selectman.  Vote for the O’s…Joe Tito and Mike Costello for Selectman on April 4, 2011.

Sue Pimental, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 28, 2011

Chris Cooper:  “ . . . a positive force with fresh ideas.”

  It was with great interest that I watched the Rehoboth Business Associations candidate night. It was a most enlightening event. I listened to everyone. I liked what I heard Mr. Cooper say, especially how as a member of the school committee he could help heal our community. Mr. Cooper will use all of his skills to help solve the difficulties facing our school system. He would be a positive force with fresh ideas.

    He wants to be a part of the team working to provide our children with a more than an adequate education. He wants more than that for our children .

   He believes in HONESTY, INTEGRITY, and TEAMWORK.

   Mr. Cooper’s number one priority is the education of our children. He will do his best to ensure that our students have everything possible to prepare them for their future.

   On April 4th I hope you will join me in the support of Chris Cooper for school committee.

Richard Barrett, Vice-Chair Dighton-Rehoboth School District Committee

-----------------------

March 28, 2011

Why I support Tiffany and Peter for D-R School Committee.

  The present five Rehoboth School Committee members do NOT have any children in our Rehoboth K – 8 schools. Also, after Jim Paon leaves the committee, only Ray Medeiros has a child who is a student at D-R High School.  It is very important to have some school committee members who have first hand knowledge of what’s happening in our schools. It is helpful for curriculum discussions and for budget discussions.

   Of the four candidates for School Committee from Rehoboth only Tiffany Bartholomew and Peter Hebda presently have children who attend Dighton- Rehoboth Schools.  I look forward to their participation in discussions around the table when they get onto the Committee.

   Just having kids in our schools is NOT the only reason I support both Tiffany and Peter.

   Tiffany has been actively volunteering in our school district for nine years. She did a great job as PTSA President helping to continue and expand programs that help our elementary school and middle school. She has great “training” to be a School Committee member.

   I have been watching Peter Hebda get more and more involved in school and community issues over the past few years. I really like the way Peter analyzes the problem and does his homework before deciding which way he is going to go on an issue. I guess that’s the engineer in Peter that gives him that processing skill.

   We have a great opportunity to fill the two Rehoboth School Committee seats with both of these people who, I feel will be assets to the Committee for many years to come.

   Please join me in voting for both Tiffany and Peter for School Committee on April 4th.

David Katseff, Member D-R Regional School Committee

-----------------------

March 28, 2011

Dear Fellow Rehoboth Voters.

   The weather is starting to break.  The crocuses are sprouting.  We want to get outside and clean up after this long, hard winter.  We’re making decisions about what to plant in our gardens, which projects we want to tackle to improve our homes and property and how we’d like to spend summer vacation.    

   Sometimes we get so busy in our daily lives that we lose sight of what is going on in the community that we call home.  Rehoboth has a biblical reference having the Hebrew definition meaning “space for all”.  That is a great description of our Town!  Expanding on that concept I also believe that there is room for all ideas which lead to problem solving solutions.  If we want community leaders who value this notion we must participate in the democratic process in which we are so fortunate to have the freedom to take part.

   This Monday, April 4th we all have the responsibility to let our voices be heard by means of our vote.  Typically, only 25 – 30 % of registered voters in Rehoboth go to the polls on Election Day.  We are at a critical juncture in the direction and future of our town.  It is more important than ever for us to take time from our busy schedule to fulfill our civic duty as citizens and cast our vote!

   My wife Marie and I have lived in town for nearly 20 years and have raised our family here.  Our daughters Ashley and Brianna received a quality education in the Dighton-Rehoboth Regional school system.  Ashley is a pre-med student at UMASS Amherst and Brianna is graduating from D-R this year with an interest in criminal justice.  I have been an active member of the Dighton-Rehoboth Regional School Committee for the past 3 years as well as a member of Rehoboth Rescue 7.  I established Rhode Island Sound Entertainment in 1985 and Ashley Elizabeth Jewelers in 1990.  I have been fortunate to live the American dream of charting my own course as an entrepreneur and have learned to change with the economic times to keep this dream alive and well.

   Now that my tenure on the school committee is coming to an end I wish to continue my service to the town by using my skills as a businessman and town official.  I am running to be your selectman for a one year term.  I have already begun the challenge of reaching out to various individuals and boards to foster a renewed sense of cooperation and unity.  It is what Rehoboth desperately needs right now.  The years I have spent in customer relations has prepared me well for what will be a mediator-like leadership role.   

   My priorities as Your Selectman are: To UNITE the community to solve REAL Town issues such as control spending and maintain a low tax base.  I will work with FEMA and our highway department to repair Rehoboth’s infrastructure, bridges and culverts. I will encourage new business to defray our tax burden, restore the Council on Aging budget to reinstate Friday accessibility and hire a full-time Director. I support mandatory CORI checks of all municipal employees, elected and appointed officials. I will implement a Master Plan Commission to project Rehoboth’s future over the next 50 years.

   Just as spring has a way of energizing us to get things accomplished by seeing that hope for better days ahead, I believe that better days are ahead for Rehoboth as well!  I would appreciate your VOTE on Monday, April 4th so I can carry out these goals as Your Selectman.  Thank you.

Jim Paon, Rehoboth Resident

Editor’s Note:  This is a personal letter submitted  by Jim, a candidate for the Rehoboth Board of Selectmen.  His formal position statement is available on the Candidates page.

-----------------------

March 26, 2011

Please join me in voting for Tiffany Bartholomew.

  For the past 7 years, I have had the pleasure of working with Tiffany Bartholomew, through our mutual commitment to the Rehoboth PTSA.  Tiffany served two terms as PTSA President, and she is dedicated to various PTSA committees for the benefit of the Rehoboth K-8 students.  She is currently, a Parent Representative on the Beckwith School Council and she has served the district on administrative search committees.

   She is extremely hard-working, and conscientious in everything that she commits herself to. I cannot think of another person in town who has devoted more time and energy, in such a variety of capacities for the kids of Rehoboth.  She has served the children of Rehoboth quietly, and without fanfare because she genuinely cares about each student's education and well being.

    Why wouldn't you support someone who has already proven her commitment to our Rehoboth students through her endless volunteering, proven leadership, and heartfelt advocacy?  Please join me in voting for Tiffany Bartholomew for School Committee on Monday, April 4th!

Sue Duncan, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 25, 2011

Candidate Tito: “exhibits all the qualities of the Boy Scout Law.”

     I would like to take the opportunity to express my support for Joe Tito who is running for the 1 year term for selectman in Rehoboth.  I have known Joe for a number of years through our mutual volunteering in the Scouting program in our town.  He was always enthusiastic, patient, hard working and available to the youth and families of Pack 1.  As Cubmaster, he not only ran his own unit’s meetings and activities, but also attended monthly Roundtable leader trainings to ensure that he had the most current information and resources to provide a top quality program for our boys.  He shared his experience with newer leaders to help them along the Scouting trail and “pay it forward.”  Joe certainly exhibits the qualities of the Scout Law, including Trustworthy, Loyal, Helpful and especially Courteous—traits that we should expect from ALL of our Selectman.

    On a separate note, the letter from Ms. Balents regarding Dr. Tito “texting from the operating room” could give readers the wrong impression.  I’m not sure how familiar she may be with either the set up or inner workings of an operating room.  Having a mother who worked as a surgical nurse for more than 25 years and having personally volunteered in the instrument room while in school, I feel qualified to comment.  An “Operating Room” consists of not only the individual surgical suites where procedures are performed, but also an administrative area, locker rooms, staff lounges and sometimes individual offices.  It was not uncommon for my mother or other staff members to make and receive calls (this was before cell phones), change clothing, eat, read or socialize on a break between cases.  Why would a doctor sending a text message between cases be cause for comment or derision?  I can assure you that he would not have been stepping back from a sterile operating table, gowned and gloved, to send a text.  Please give our medical professionals the respect and credit they deserve. 

    You can be certain that Joe Tito has mine and that I will be supporting him at the polls on April 4.

Diana Hammond, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 25, 2011

“Balents makes another unfounded attack on a good man.”

    Ms. Balents is at it again.  She has written another attack letter and has impugned the character of a good man whom I have known to display nothing but the best of character. 

    She has insinuated that Dr. Tito sends text messages while in the operating theater.  Anyone with an ounce of sense and who knows an iota about medical procedures and hospital policy knows that this is baseless hyperbole.  Anyone who knows Dr. Tito knows that his staff, and patients hold him in the highest regard.

    While It appears that Ms. Balents is not so well informed on the subject of modern medicine, she is an expert when it comes to the subjects of character assassination and deliberate misinformation.

    I regard Ms. Balents’ comments as reprehensible and the last gasp of dying campaign.

James Muri, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 25, 2011

Past Rehoboth Selectman Tobin is “outraged” at Foley and Leffort.

   I am outraged that Foley and Leffort believe they can revise the Police Chief's contract to allow him to live out of town. Rehoboth bylaws clearly state that the Police Chief must reside in Rehoboth.

   The state law allowing a police chief to reside within 15 miles of the municipality he serves applies ONLY if a community does not have a bylaw requiring the chief's residency in the town.

   I know that in the 12 years I served as a Rehoboth Selectman qualified candidates withdrew from consideration because they were unwilling or unable to reside in Rehoboth. The bylaw can only be changed by the voters at town meeting. I would suggest that Foley read the Rehoboth bylaws, and also the Handbook for Massachusetts Selectmen before taking an illegal action.

Arthur Tobin, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 25, 2011

Paon “running from the past.”

     Jim Paon’s campaign slogan is “Running for a Brighter Tomorrow” although it might be more accurate if it were “Running from the Past”. It was three short years ago when Mr. Paon campaigned for a spot on the school committee as a proud member of the Chris Morra and Ken Foley Reform Party. Now Paon wants to distance himself from Morra and Foley and wants everyone to believe he is an independent candidate. There is an old saying that you can move a pony from one stall to another but it still smells like a pony, and I smell some manure coming from the Paon campaign.

    Paon’s campaign makes lots of promises but offers no specifics for fulfilling them. Like his reformer predecessors, he talks in sound bites and lacks substance. He tells people only what he thinks they want to hear and is so busy “running” that he doesn’t take time to stop and tell the voters “how” he plans on enacting change. The last thing a reformer wants is for someone to ask them to detail their plans. Fellow reformer Don Leffort used this tactic last year when he claimed a week before the election that he had a “plan for the library” – one year later and we are still waiting for him to unveil it.

    On April 4th we have a choice to make. We can vote to continue the failed reform party policies and politics that have brought us to where we are today or we can vote for a new and positive future for our Town. A vote for Paon or Foley insures a future of running from the real issues while pursuing the reformer’s political and personal agendas. A vote for Costello and Tito is a vote for real plans to address the real issues facing our Town.

Gerry Schwall, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 25, 2011

Letter of Support for Tiffany Bartholomew.

  I have had the pleasure of working with Tiffany Bartholomew in various capacities over the past few years. 

   I would like to support her candidacy for School Committee by sharing my experience and observations.  My first recollection of working with Tiffany was years ago with the Fall Festival at Palmer River.  I remember her, as well as her family, taking an active role in the organization of the festival.  Later, she would go on to successfully run the Palmer River PTSA as President.  As I recall, she was able to conduct the organization well, mobilize volunteers and work with school staff in order to accomplish her goals.  Any time I needed assistance, she handled my requests promptly and professionally. 

   Her follow-up skills are wonderful and as someone who values customer service, I have always appreciated that she would get back to me with results and always in a pleasant manner.  I know of her involvement with School Council at Beckwith and she currently serves as PTSA Vice-President for the middle school.  We were both participants in the middle school foreign language committee. 

   One of the characteristics that struck me during that process was her ability to listen to different viewpoints, conduct relevant research, and follow that information to a reasonable conclusion.  At that time she was also serving on a committee for the K-12 curriculum and was able to focus our efforts based on her knowledge of goals for the district.

   I also worked with her as a parent on behalf of the middle school play.  She helped with everything from costumes to backstage assistance.  Lastly, she helped reintroduce STEM night at Beckwith.  I was surprised by the number of different activities going on and the varied groups such as police, fire, rescue squad, etc. that were present to show students the types of services they provide. 

    I remember thinking that night about how people like Tiffany make a difference to this learning community by volunteering and stepping in (sometime when no one else does) to make things better. I have seen her do this in countless ways over the past years so I am confident she will be an asset to the School Committee.  This is just a sample of what I have observed, and am guessing, it is not all she has done!  I would like to encourage voters to seriously consider her for your vote for School Committee. 

    As a parent who also intends to have my children continue in this school system, I know she has our children's best interests at heart.  She has a vested interest on behalf of her child and ours.  In addition, she has the necessary skills and experience to work with many different stakeholders (teachers, administrators, parents and students) to help improve processes.  She has been doing just that in the years leading up to this point.  She has a level-headed manner and an ability to work with people constructively that will serve us well. 

   She already has a knowledge of how to work on committees that ultimately impact the school.  Most importantly, she is not a person who only speaks of making things better, she has taken actions to do so, and this alone speaks volumes of the kind of representative she will be for the School Committee.  

Rachel Philip, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 24, 2011

They hired a public relations person for a selectman position?

    According to an email that was sent by Robyn Balents, the Reformers appear to have hired a public relations firm to prepare written statements for supporters of Ken Foley and Jim Paon to sign their name to it. 

   If you support Ken Foley and Jim Paon, why can't you prepare and write your own letter of support? Why would you hire a public relations person for a Selectman position in Rehoboth?   Why would you spend thousands of dollars on a life size poster of yourself for a one-year position that pays nothing?  It’s all about the power and control. 

   Robyn wrote:  “Forgot to ask you if ............would put their name to one of these editorials that the PR guy wrote, like this one."  

   Below is what was included in her email:

   “Why does it take a Providence TV station to unearth corruption in Rehoboth? Seems like keeping an eye on our local town government is a job for the Gazette (Sun-Chronicle).  Confirmation that for years the FBI and Attorney General Coakley’s office have been digging into wrong doing at the police department, and who knows where else is troubling to say the least.  That the Gazette (Sun-Chronicle) wasn’t able to figure this out is shameful."

   “Hats off to Selectmen Ken Foley for doing the right thing in Rehoboth. Seems Foley’s been cooperating with the FBI for years as the feds look at some suspected bad apples in the police department. Foley’s backed the police chief since he was hired, and apparently for a good reason. Foley deserves to be re-elected next month. Better to have a bull-dog guarding the hen house than a fox."

     Why does a supporter of Ken Foley and Jim Paon need someone to write a letter of support for them?  If you support either candidate can't you write why you are supporting them? 

    There is an investigation into "alleged" improper background checks by some officers in Rehoboth and several other communities. The allegations are made by Chris Morra, reform party leader.  These allegations are from over FOUR years ago.  Sounds to me that the police chief and Ken Foley were assisting Chris Morra with the authorities.  That's the priority of Ken Foley and the reformers?  Alleged illegal background checks by some officers in Rehoboth and several other communities from FOUR years ago by one individual? 

    Looks like the Reformers (Ken Foley, Jim Paon, Robyn Ballents) will stop at nothing to keep control.  The police chief refuses to release the goat that was alleged to have been "gutted" and dropped in front of Chris Morra's house and he got a lot of media coverage for this...even thought the goat died of natural causes.  Maybe the chief and the public relations guy came up with the story to invoke some sympathy and help spin a story for the reformers?  When you read the letters to the editors, you'll have to wonder if the person who signed it actually wrote it or did the Reformers public relation guy write it and had someone sign their name to it.

   Vote to stop the insanity...vote for the O's....Joe Tito and Mike Costello for Selectman. 

Brad Doyle, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 24, 2011

Ken Foley is the ONLY man for the job.

       I’d like to take this opportunity to tell you all about a man who I consider to be one of the most kindest, honest and loyal men that I have ever come to know, Mr. Ken Foley. For you to truly appreciate this man you would have to spend time with him. His day consists of waking around 5:00 am, working at one of his two businesses he runs during the day, while seeing to town business and finally culminating at his beloved Francis Farm which he and his family lovingly have restored over the past 7 years. His day can easily go on until 11:00 pm or longer. In all the years that I have known Ken I have never seen him complain or have a bad word to say about anybody. He knows no malice toward anything or anybody who walks this earth. He carries no grudge and he never speaks of revenge. Ken is a man who genuinely has that innate ability of just being a “good man.” He always has time to listen, and he is a great listener. 

    Through the years Ken has become involved in many different philanthropic ventures from being a Big Brother to his involvement with the various organizations that he lends his function facilities to gratis....the American Cancer Society, Ronald McDonald House, and other organizations too numerous to name. He has been named “Man of the Year,” has served tirelessly on the Boards as a Director to countless non-profit organizations. Beyond donating his facilities, he has donated his time and self along with sizeable monetary donations to organizations such as Little Sisters of the Poor, the Boys and Girls Club, to name just a couple, as I don’t have the time or am allowed the space to truly identified all the people, families and organizations he has helped thus far in his life. 

    I will sum up this piece by saying, I would literally trust Ken Foley with my life. I cannot put more faith and trust into another human being other than my beloved parents. Ken Foley is a man of integrity, he holds himself to the highest standards and lives a life of selfless service to all and anyone who he comes into contact with. For those of you who truly know Ken, you know exactly what I am talking about. So, please, if I would trust Ken Foley with my life, trust him with your town. He is the ONLY man for this job. He is the ONLY man who will see Rehoboth through this turmoil with righteousness, and dignity. He has supported the weight of a two year Federal investigation with honor and integrity, and he has held himself to the highest fiduciary responsibility. Please show him your support on Monday April 4th and re-elect Selectman Foley.

Robyn Balents, incumbent candidate for School Committee

-----------------------

March 24, 2011

Personal Reference for Dr. Tito.

     I am writing to recommend Joe Tito for selectman, in the Town of Rehoboth, MA. I have spent many a night around the camp fire with Joe discussing his personal beliefs and his outlook on life. Joe is a no-nonsense guy, who when challenged with hard decisions, has always researched all the possible outcomes, and has always chosen the best solution.

   I know this to be true because of our tenure together as Cub Scout Leaders in town, as well as watching his hard work as a Planning Board member. Joe wanted to get involved with the Planning Board after moving to Rehoboth and enjoying its country setting and open space. Joe truly cares about the Town of Rehoboth and because of that, he has volunteered his time to help direct the future of Rehoboth. As a volunteer with Cub Scouts, he helped educate and raise the boys of Rehoboth to become responsible young men. Joe was a much respected leader amongst his peers within the Cub Scout organization.

   Dr. Tito's professional record stands on it own merits. As a  general surgeon, partner in a private practice, Chief Resident, Department Head, and as the 1st. Vice President of Morton Hospital, his decision making ability, diverse area of responsibility, and his unique ability to lead the best and the brightest in his field has always been, and continues to be, consistently evident. Joe Tito is the man Rehoboth needs to lead the town through the most tumultuous time in my memory.

   Joe Tito is a tremendous asset to the Town of Rehoboth and I recommend him without reservation.

Erik Hoskins, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 24, 2011

Dr. Tito/Candidate Tito:  Texting from the Operating Room?

     We’re all busy. But some are beyond busy, and this is a problem for not only them but those they serve. When someone is beyond busy it can affect their ability to make critical decisions. Judgement is sometimes impaired, and I think that is exactly what happened with Dr. Tito recently.

    When Channel 10's Jim Tarricani announced he would break news involving alleged corruption in Rehoboth and on our police department it was a sad and troubling day in Rehoboth, and apparently in the operating room at Morton Hospital as well.

   You see, Dr. Tito was so troubled, he stopped what he was doing and sent a text straight from the operating room! As I stated earlier, we are all busy, but some of us beyond busy, so busy that it affects our judgement. Dr. Tito openly stated, "I'm in the operating room....no reason Paon should have the heads up on this one...someone should call the tv station..."

    Clearly one has to question the integrity of a man who would even have his cell phone on while in surgery! Oh, and by the way, if elected Selectman, he plans on keeping his seat on the Planning Board.

Robyn Balents, incumbent candidate for School Committee

-----------------------

March 23, 2011

Vice Chairman of School Committee Supports Candidate Hebda.

    I've been asked if I support Mr Peter Hebda and my answer is yes I do. Webster's defines integrity as having the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles. That's the Mr Hebda I know. He has one child in Palmer River and another child ready to enter our school system next year. The education of our children is his number one concern.

   Mr Hebda understands the economic situation we are in at the present time and will bring a fresh outlook to the committee helping us make the best decision with what we have. Mr Hebda thinks problems through from all angles before he speaks. He will always have the education and well being of our children as his number one priority. That's why on April 4th I ask you to join me in supporting Peter Hebda for School Committee.

Richard S. Barrett, Vice-Chairman of the D-R Regional School Committee

-----------------------

March 22, 2011

Foley Running on Failed Record.

   During a recent Meet the Candidates event Ken Foley, who is running for re-election, admitted that he has no idea what is wrong in Rehoboth, has no idea what to do about it, and pledged to continue the same failed reformer policies he clung to over the past three years. Mr. Foley actually thinks he is doing a good job and it’s everyone else who is wrong. How sad for Mr. Foley.

    Incumbents seeking reelection should be forced to run on their record. Mr. Foley had three years to deliver on the promises he made during his campaign and the record reflects he has failed miserably. It’s a simple question; “are we better off today than we were three years ago?”

   The answer is equally simple; “no”. Granted these are difficult times, yet under Foley’s leadership nothing positive has occurred and he admits he has nothing to offer except three more years of the same.

   On April 4th vote to put Rehoboth back in the hands of people who have real plans to support their campaign promises. Vote for Mike Costello and Joe Tito.

Gerry Schwall, Rehoboth, MA

-----------------------

March 22, 2011

Writing in Support of Peter Hebda.

    I am writing in support of Peter Hebda, who is running for Dighton-Rehoboth School Committee on April 4.

   Peter is a man of integrity who WILL have the children and the families of Rehoboth as his priority while serving our town, not his own self-interest or someone else's misguided agenda.  Peter is also knowledgeable, competent and qualified, responsible, and intelligent.  Qualities that are sorely needed!

   Please take the small amount of time it takes to vote as an investment in your future!!

Liz Day, Rehoboth resident

-----------------------

March 22, 2011

Writing in Support of Tiffany Bartholomew.

  It is with great enthusiasm that I ask you to join me and vote for Tiffany Bartholomew for School Committee. Tiffany is highly qualified to join the School Committee.

   She has proven her skills as a fair and balanced leader and as an effective communicator.  Tiffany has shown her dedication to our school district by serving on district committees, PTSA committees, and devoting many volunteer hours to our schools. 

   She has successfully worked with diverse groups of individuals to obtain results that have benefited our students and our school district.  As the PTSA president she effectively managed annual budgets and fundraising efforts and, as a member of the Beckwith School Council, she has actively participated in budget development and school improvement planning. 

   Tiffany has worked tirelessly to improve communication with parents, the community and the school district.  Her experience will be of great benefit to the School Committee moving forward in these fiscally difficult times. 

   Tiffany’s proven ability to work well in a team setting will be vital to meeting the challenge of ever increasing costs with limited funding.

   Please vote for Tiffany Bartholomew for School Committee.  Thank you.

Casey Hall, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 22, 2011

Full Support for Joe Tito for Selectmen.

   I am writing to express my full support for Joe Tito for Selectman.  

    I have lived in Rehoboth for 15 years and have never followed town politics closely until recently; I am enraged at the manipulation and dissention going on in our town. We need change!!

    When Joe Tito approached me and asked my opinion on if he should run for selectman I told him I could not think of a better candidate. I have had the pleasure of living next door to Joe for the past 4 years and can honestly say he is unquestionably one of the most reasonable and impartial people I know.

    To become a surgeon you have to study extensively, work hard and spend long hours doing research. To be a good surgeon you must continue to keep up with research, weigh all possibilities, and keep the best interest of your patient at heart. This is how Joe leads his life in and out of work, this is who he is and this is how he will act as our Selectman.

    The priorities of the town have been put on the ‘back burner’ for far too long, the voices of the people are being ignored. We need Selectmen that will run the town professionally, respectfully and abide by all bylaws and Massachusetts general law.

    I urge everyone to get out and vote on April 4th and let the voices of the people be heard!

Christine Oberlander, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 21, 2011

Support for Candidates for Selectmen Mike Costello and Joe Tito

A vote for Joe Tito is a vote for the voice of the people.

Joe Tito is running for the 1-year term as selectman in Rehoboth.   I did not know Joe, prior to attending   meetings and meet the candidate events.  I have listened to Joe speak, and have spoken with him; and what I heard left me very impressed with Joe Tito.  Many of his concerns for Rehoboth are of dire need.

1.)    Joe believes that town meeting votes count, and the BOS has the responsibility to carry out the vote of Town Meeting.

2.)    Joe believes strongly in transparency.  He will have open government for all citizens, and authorize the release of Executive Session minutes in accordance with the law.

3.)    Joe has integrity.  He will once again bring integrity back to the Board of Selectman.   Joe will listen to our residents’ concerns and treat them as his equal.

 A vote for Joe Tito for selectman on April 4th is a vote for the voice of the people. 

Mike Costello, a Tried and True Public Servant

Mike Costello, candidate for the 3-year term as selectman in Rehoboth, has dedicated his time and served the Town of Rehoboth for 22 years.   Mike is the present chairman of the Planning Board, served as Storm Water Agent, and served on the Energy Commission.  The past two years he has taken on the additional responsibility (without compensation) of maintaining the physical integrity of the Senior Center with excellent response time, service and results. 

Mike has proven to be a tried and true public servant who has demonstrated year after year he cares and is committed to serving our town.

Mike has thorough knowledge of the town’s general and zoning bylaws. He has co-authored many of our town bylaws, and knows the importance of town officials enforcing our bylaws equally and not abused by a select few.  

Mike has a vision to once again have transparency and open government in Rehoboth.  He will return town government back to all residents of our town. 

Please join me in voting for Mike Costello for selectman on April 4th.   Together we can return our town back to “We the People.”

Lorraine Botts, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 18, 2011

Robyn Balents Needs to do her Homework.

    Ms. Balents should check her facts before commenting on issues.  She asserts that Rehoboth Planning Board members are the force behind development within the Town of Rehoboth.  Further she asserts that because of them development has been on the rise.  If Ms. Balents had spent any time actually researching the topic she would know the following facts:

1. The Planning Board does not "develop".  The Planning Board receives applications from others who wish to develop their property.  The Planning Board is responsible for ensuring that the applicant adheres to all of the laws in Massachusetts General Law and also the Bylaws of the Town of Rehoboth.  I suppose if we wish to extend Ms. Balents' logic to the School Committee, then Ms. Balents is responsible for approximately $35 Million in taxpayer budget, because she allows children to enroll in the DR School District.

2. If a developer meets all of the requirements in MGL and Rehoboth Bylaws, the Planning Board MUST (according to MGL ch. 41) issue the appropriate approvals. If the Planning Board fails to issue these approvals, then the Town of Rehoboth would be subject to lawsuits. MGL guarantees the right of landowners to use their land as they see fit, subject to the constraints of MGL and local bylaws.  We've already seen what happens when elected officials ignore the law and make decisions arbitrarily; the Town is currently involved in numerous lawsuits which will undoubtedly increase the tax burden further down the road when the Town has to pay for these suits.

3. Development has actually decreased over the past several years; according to the statistics kept by the Rehoboth Planning Board. In 2006 there were 98 house lots created, 103 in 2007, 71 in 2008, 37 in 2009, and 43 in 2010.  Likewise there were 5 subdivision approvals granted in 2006, 2 in 2007, 0 in 2008, 0 in 2009, and 0 in 2010.  When I graph these on a chart, I see a line that is definitely trending down, perhaps Ms. Balents knows of some new kind of math that I don't.

4. Ms. Balents asserts "Not only have they advocated for over-development, they have allowed inferior development."  Over the past several years, the Planning Board has made numerous modifications to the Rehoboth Subdivsion Control Regulations (The policy which describes the specifications to which developers must adhere) which has significantly increased the standard.  This includes specifications for drainage, roadway construction, landscaping requirements, utilities, and maintenance of common structures.  Under the current Planning Board these specifications have been changed to ensure higher quality roadways, improved drainage, improved aesthetics, and reduction in maintenance costs to the Town.

5. On the question of the meeting minutes, the minutes have been kept up-to-date since our current Planner has been working for the Town.  The problem with the past meeting minutes was a lack of a Planner or Planner's aide.  As you may recall Ms. Balents, Mr. Foley and Mr. Leffort (currently Selectmen) advocated at the last Town Meeting to zero the Planner's salary and effectively remove her, which would have only aggravated this situation.  Under Chairman Costello, the Planning Board has been actively pursuing approval of old minutes, while ensuring that current meeting minutes are up-to-date.  This has included individual Board members volunteering their personal time to review old DVDs and transcribing meeting minutes.

6. As for advocating against CORI checks, you may recall that the language in the article before town meeting included the phrase "felonies and other serious crimes".  Joe Tito and Mike Costello have articulated on several occasions that this vague language was unacceptable; please define for me "serious crimes", speeding, jaywalking?  And equally vague in this article was who was to be the judge of these serious crimes, the selectmen?  Both men have maintained that CORI checks are appropriate for town employees and others who work with children and the elderly, but the article that was proposed was nothing short of something one would expect to find in a dictatorship.

    Ms. Balents, in the future, consider doing your homework prior to making unfounded accusations.  Joe Tito, Mike Costello, and the rest of the Rehoboth Planning Board have worked diligently to improve the overall quality of projects that have come before the Board, while minimizing their financial impact on the Town.

James Muri, Rehoboth Resident and Planning Board Member

-----------------------

March 17, 2011

“Ms. Balents’ Agrument is Flawed.”

   I too have watched and held my breath, and bit my tongue, each time all facts to an issue are not presented correctly.  Now Ms Balents’ argument is flawed in that she says that local funding for the schools is solely provided from our property taxes. She forgets to mention just how the school budget is actually funded.  This may confuse Ms. Balents, but there is much more to the formula for the school operating budget than the property tax figures she is referring to and what is more commonly known as the “minimum contribution.”  Just over 43% comes from what is known as chapter 70 funds, as well as title 1 funding, local and national grants, etc.. come together to create the school operating budget as a whole. 

    Another distorted fact in her argument is that over-development is sending our tax bills “to places that many of us have never imagined.”  Last time I checked proposition 2 ½ was enacted to keep our tax bills from doing just that.  And I quote “Proposition 2½ limits the amount of revenue a city or town may raise from local property taxes each year to fund municipal operations.  Communities must seek voter approval to raise additional funds beyond Proposition 2½ limits.”  We as the town of Rehoboth seek this approval if we wish to override proposition 2 ½ in our annual town meeting. 

    As I am a fiscal conservative these fact distortions trouble me because the tax payers of Rehoboth are smarter than that. Perhaps Ms. Balents should review her school committee member ethics charter that is posted on the district website.  I would point specifically to those items such as; putting the children first, be well informed, and not “play politics.”

    As Ms. Balents is a steward of the tax payers of Rehoboth in her capacity as an elected official on the school committee, I question her ability to continue to serve on our behalf.  I urge you to please vote responsibly on April 4th.

Scott Bartholomew, Rehoboth Resident

-----------------------

March 8, 2011

Power to ALL the People of Rehoboth.

     Let me begin by identifying my affiliation to this publication.  I am the husband of the owner/editor of RehobothNow.  This letter is an expression of my personal opinions and not the opinions of this publication.

      We have an election coming up in this town.  There are many contentious issues and many people at elevated levels of passion. Who is good or bad?  What is fair or unfair? What is legal or illegal? 

      I submit to you that no one here is all good or all bad.  I know I’m not, and I respectfully submit you probably aren’t either. What bothers me is that we have degenerated (yes, I checked the definition) to a level where gloves are off, venom is flowing freely, and reason is lost in the fury.    Accusations fly every day on a number of issues. Sides have been taken and the moral high-ground is claimed on both.

     We are in a terrible situation and we need to figure it out, but it’s going to be a difficult road if everyone insists on prevailing.

   Currently, it seems to me that majority public opinion is claimed between two groups in town.  Let me make very clear that I’m not a member of either.  But I’m hopeful there are enough independently-minded people left in town who can take control of an out-of-control situation. 

   To both groups: my suggestion is to separate your concerns on issues from your concerns with individuals.  You’ll serve the public better by presenting the logic behind your arguments without your distaste for each other.  I don’t care what group you belong to, but I am very interested in your logic.  It helps me form an opinion when I vote. And it’s your opportunity to influence a majority if you handle it correctly. 

    Some of the most troubling ideas I have heard involved the will of the voters of this town.  On one side, we have the idea that town meeting is not representative of the town because only a small fraction of the population attend and vote.  One the other side, we’ve heard that one of our selectmen lacks a mandate because he won office by only a small margin. 

    To both sides, guess what? You’re both right and you’re both wrong.  The numbers you use as the basis of your arguments don’t lie, however your use of these numbers to justify rejection of democratically determined outcomes is a disservice to us all. 

    Here is reality as I see it.  Everyone who is eligible to vote should vote.   If they choose not to, it is not your right to assume they would have voted on your side.  So, if we elect someone by a small margin, they are just as elected as if by a large margin.  If town meeting voters pass an article, it is valid.  Period.  If the will of the people, as defined by the results of an election or town meeting vote, is not truly the will of the people, then there are only two paths to resolution. 

     Option 1 - CHANGE THE SYSTEM:  One way to address perceived problems in our town government is to change the rules.  Should we eliminate town meeting as part of a re-configuration of town government?  Should we increase the board of selectmen to five members?  These are both valid questions.  My personal answer to both is that I’m still trying to listen to arguments pro and con.  While there are compelling arguments both ways on both issues, these arguments are surrounded by so much noise that I find it hard to focus. 

    Option 2 - GET OUT AND VOTE:  If everyone would vote, we would know what the majority public opinions are in this town.  Obviously, this is but a dream in the case of town meeting.  We don’t have a public location large enough anywhere inside to accommodate all of our voters.  Of course, this has never been a problem over hundreds of years because we don’t typically have that kind of turnout. 

   When Richard Nixon was President of the United States, he talked about the “Great Silent Majority.” My personal opinion is that Nixon used this as a poor justification for actions that defied our system of democracy in the most fundamental way.  But I do believe that, in different ways, both political factions in the town of Rehoboth have, at different times, claimed a similar great silent majority. 

   This is my call to all of you who represent Rehoboth’s Great Silent Majority.   GET OUT AND VOTE in our next election.  Go to the town meetings.  Go to selectmen’s meetings.  Leave the silent majority and give us an undeniable consensus of opinion.  Don’t let either of these groups claim your mandate because you are silent.

POWER TO THE PEOPLE OF REHOBOTH - ALL THE PEOPLE!

John Jordan, Rehoboth resident

-----------------------

March 6, 2011

We take this moment to bring you a message from the RehobothNow editor.

    It has always been common journalistic practice for the editor to write the headlines and subtitles, that includes letters submitted for publication from readers.  I stand behind mine because each clarifies the content and fits into the layout space.  As any editor knows, strong headlines attract attention.  There is only one intent, to get people to read the material.  After that they can filter the information as they see fit.  No matter what I publish, someone will not like what they have read.

    Yesterday I received an email from letter writer Pamela Christman: “You did it again, one half the story in your title.  A positive vote will push the legislation through.  Yes, and a negative vote will stop it.  Can’t you at least attempt to be fair? (Note:  I have printed all the Vox Populi letters she has sent me.)  

    Later in the day I received a detailed letter from Jay Kelley, husband of Rehoboth Concerned Citizens founder Bonnie Kelley.  (Note: I have printed every Vox letter that Mrs. Kelley has sent to me.)  I also include her meeting announcements in several places in this publication and provide links to other articles written about her organized effort to facilitate change in Rehoboth.  (Note: I reluctantly refrain from using the word ‘reform’ to avoid assumptions of affiliation with any group.)

   Jay Kelley questioned the nature and credibility of this publication.  He wrote, “  . . . if your venture is journalistic in nature, your choice of words in the headline of each shows extreme bias. The key verbs used in both titles clearly display the editor’s partiality.” His complete letter can be found below.

    I was surprised to learn the headlines reflect my partiality on the three-to-five issue.  Actually I used the titles given to me by both Ms. Christman and Ms. Baker within those headlines.  More importantly, they clearly explain the content of the letters.  And it got people to read them, which I believe was the desired intent.

    Personally, I only care that the town of Rehoboth has an odd number to serve on the board of selectmen, whether it is three or five or seven or nine.  I care about the people being allowed to vote on that issue as well as others.  I care about how our local and state officials spend their time.  I care about the town and people of Rehoboth. That’s why I spend thirty hours a week working on this  publication with minimal financial return.  I accept advertising from anyone who can pay me and give free ad space to nonprofits in town.  I promote every group and organization that provides me with information. 

    I am in a unique position because I did not grow up in town.  I don’t belong to “one side” or the “other side.”  And I don’t have any close personal relationships with anyone on either side of the fence. 

     Frankly, it is becoming a challenge to keep the teams and players straight.  There are many different games being played simultaneously, each with their own unique set of rules, hidden agendas and ringers.   Thrown in some long-standing feuds and grandstanding.  Add some vicious accusations and childish name calling.  Toss in an obsession with minutia combined with an alarming amount of paranoia. Finally, sprinkle on the abundant and insulting use of dictionary definitions to make a point.  

    Soon, I’ll be needing a giant white board and a entire pack of markers to diagram the goings-on in town. In any competitive sport, the use of distinctive identification helps. Uniforms and helmets anyone? Shirts and skins?  As for me, I don’t have the time to play.  I really have too much work to do.

Connie Wenzel-Jordan, Editor RehobothNow.com and resident since 1984

-----------------------

March 6, 2011

Is RehobothNow Journalism or Informational?

     Just a quick question. Does the editor and Rehobothnow.com purport themselves to be a journalistic enterprise? Or is just informational? I am curious and a bit perplexed. Until today, I believed that Rehobothnow.com was fulfilling an important journalistic void. If it just informational, then my following comments will hold no water. But, if indeed it is an exercise in journalism, then you have fallen wholly short. Your editor’s note from March 4, 2011 on your Vox Populi page, “The two opinion letters below are not news reports.  Rather they both contain carefully selected statistical information from online sources that reinforce their particular arguments.  Neither letter contains all the municipal statistical data available for a fully complete unemotional analysis.  By omitting certain statistics, the data has indeed been manipulated by both writers, an altogether common practice during the course of an argument.”  was right on the mark. In all persuasive arguments, the composer will, in the course of writing, use those statistics that best supports the writer’s position and ignore those statistics that would not support his/her argument. Rehobothnow.com states, “Published information DOES NOT reflect the views and/or opinions of the publisher and/or staff of RehobothNow.com. & RehobothNow.com reserves the right to refuse to publish individual submissions and/edit for space, clarity or grammatical error.” Were the titles of each edited for clarity?

   However, if your venture is journalistic in nature, your choice of words in the headline of each shows extreme bias. The key verbs used in both titles clearly display the editor’s partiality. In the article in favor of keeping the number of selectmen at three, the editor chose the verb “explained.”  “Three-to-Five Referendum Question Explained Graphically Why change the number of selectmen from three to five?” To explain issues tends to be a positive term and according to Encarta, the term “explain” means “to give details about something; clarify the meaning of something or give reason for something.”  All good things.  

   By contrast, in the title of the article supporting a change from three to five, the editor chose the verb “manipulated.”  “Data Manipulated in Example of Towns and Three vs Five Selectmen The five member board of selectmen issue explained geographically.” According to Encarta, the term “manipulate” means “to falsify something; to change or present something in a way that is false but personally advantageous.”  This term is most definitely carries a negative subtext. 

    Were these titles chosen by the editor an attempt at “clarity?” It seems to me that the italics of each article were the title chosen by the respective writers and the non-italics title of each article was chosen by the editor.  Usually, a title is designed to best support the view of the author. Many readers will form opinions based upon the title chosen. By using terms such as “explained” and “manipulated” one often fosters a certain mindset in the reader. In the first example above, mission accomplished.  In the second, I believe the editor sabotaged and “manipulated” the opinion of the author. If Vox Populi is Latin for voice of the people, then why does the editor change the titles of articles, in effect, taking away their Vox Populi?

Jay Kelley - Rehoboth Resident